Replies

It clarifies that you are still wrong to worship the enlightenment of as you put it. "one of the most celebrated and arguably profound deist philosophers"

It is very Christian of me. Christianity means speaking out against those who seek to "Change" the word of God to meet their own small minded self importance.

Get yourself off the throne and look to God for your guidance not some self-appointed guru.

On the assumption that you are not as obtuse as your posts would imply, I will try to explain very simply the issue one last time, however for the record let may say this first. You have no idea what or who I worship. Citing an acclaimed individual, whom no credible person would attempt to characterize as an atheist, does not imply worship. Got it? Now if you can follow that point, perhaps you will understand that it is irrelevant whether or not he attempts to change to word of God or not, whether he is misguided or not etc- the issue is only whether he believes in God or not. Got that? If he believes in God, and yet does not believe in God's infallibility, then Vets original assetion is ipso facto (that means: by the fact itself) incorrect.That was the point of my post. Now lest you desire to publicly embarrass yourself again, you would be well advised to stop, shut your pie-hole, and contemplate the lesson that someone is trying to teach you. If you are unable to follow these simple points of logic, get some education, or at least blather your non sequiturs (points that do not follow) in someone else's direction, because you will not see a response from me again. Have a nice day.