Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John H K
These A-10s remind me of the old saying about the TIMEX watches: "Takes A Licking and Keeps On Ticking."

This bad plane has proved itself time and time again. In my opinion, they should evaluate these planes and find where they can improve upon them and make more. Don't mess with success.

I wonder how to compare the A-10 with the Apache Longbow helicopter? They both have somewhat the same job, but the plane seems to be able to take more abuse than the helicopter. I know that a plane cannot hover and rotate like a helicopter, but is that necessary for this particular tank and armor busting?

5 posted on 04/08/2003 1:25:19 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Geist Krieger
I know that a plane cannot hover and rotate like a helicopter, but is that necessary for this particular tank and armor busting?

An A-10 has a very very tight turning radius...I've seen them use not much more than the width of a 150 ft. runway to do a 180 degree turn.

8 posted on 04/08/2003 1:35:01 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Geist Krieger
I wonder how to compare the A-10 with the Apache Longbow helicopter? They both have somewhat the same job, but the plane seems to be able to take more abuse than the helicopter. I know that a plane cannot hover and rotate like a helicopter, but is that necessary for this particular tank and armor busting?

The reason that we have both is obvious: the Army learned that it can't trust anybody else -- even the USAF -- with the Close Air Support mission. If the AF had had its way, the A-10's would have been mothballed at Davis-Mothan after the (last) Gulf War and they wouldn't have been available for the present war.

13 posted on 04/08/2003 1:43:57 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Geist Krieger; TADSLOS
I know that a plane cannot hover and rotate like a helicopter, but is that necessary for this particular tank and armor busting?

Different ways of accomplishing the same thing- let's ping a helicopter pilot, and let him explain better than I could.

16 posted on 04/08/2003 1:51:07 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Geist Krieger
I wonder how to compare the A-10 with the Apache Longbow helicopter? They both have somewhat the same job, but the plane seems to be able to take more abuse than the helicopter. I know that a plane cannot hover and rotate like a helicopter, but is that necessary for this particular tank and armor busting?

The primary intent of Apache Longbow is to hover "out of sight", behind a hill, pop up, acquire target and fire. Unfortunately, there aren't many hills in southern and central Iraq. Thus, they are more vulnerable than the A-10's.

The A-10 has great protection for the pilot (titanium bath-tub) but it is somewhat vulnerable to SAM's. Fortunately, we've got a lot of A-10 pilots with a lot of guts.

43 posted on 04/08/2003 4:07:10 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson