Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China gets tougher with North Korea
Asia Times ^ | 4.8.03 | Antoaneta Bezlova

Posted on 04/08/2003 11:19:46 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State

China gets tougher with North Korea
By Antoaneta Bezlova

BEIJING - China's newfound interest in urging Pyongyang to go to the multilateral negotiating table reflects its growing security concerns about possible US recklessness in handling the North Korean nuclear crisis, and alarm over military resurgence from neighboring Japan.

China has obviously grown irritated with its longtime communist ally.

This year, North Korea became the first country to pull out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It kicked out the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors and shut down United Nations (UN) surveillance cameras at its Yongbyon nuclear facilities, which are capable of producing plutonium for nuclear weapons.

If North Korea declares itself a nuclear power - it admitted to having a secret nuclear weapons enrichment program in October - China is worried that threat in the region could then lead to a military arms race, possibly resulting in the nuclearization of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, all of which are allies of the United States. Beijing considers Taiwan a renegade province.

Already, Beijing is fretting over growing public debate in Japan on how to upgrade its self-defense forces to suit the country's pacifist constitution.

China is also genuinely concerned that after the bombs stop falling in Baghdad, Washington will turn its attention toward North Korea, which US President George W Bush has included in his "axis of evil" along with Iraq and Iran.

A spokesman for North Korea's Foreign Ministry said on Sunday: "The United States is seriously mistaken if it thinks the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea - North Korea's name] will accept the demand for disarming while watching one of the three countries the US listed as part of an 'axis of evil' already subject to barbarous military attack."

Among Beijing's many fears is the possibility that Pyongyang's belligerent behavior might lead to US military moves against the Yongbyon nuclear reactor - even though Washington continues to claim that Iraq is not North Korea, and that each situation requires a unique solution.

The Bush administration has refused Pyongyang's demand for bilateral talks, which it argued would reward North Korea for its nuclear brinkmanship. Pyongyang, for its part, has rejected a multilateral forum, which Washington says would reflect the fact that the crisis is as much a regional issue as a bilateral one.

As the UN Security Council is scheduled to meet on Wednesday for an initial round of discussions on the North Korean issue, Pyongyang insisted on the weekend that any action taken by the council would be ignored by the regime.

Drawing parallels between the Iraq situation and its own, the Foreign Ministry spokesman in Pyongyang, whom the state-run Korean Central News Agency did not name, said: "The UNSC [United Nations Security Council] handling of the nuclear issue on the peninsula itself is precisely a prelude to war. The UNSC's discussion of the Iraqi issue was misused by the US as an excuse for war."

The UN Security Council has the power to punish nations for violating international anti-proliferation treaties. For example, it could impose economic sanctions on Pyongyang. But North Korea has previously warned that any sanctions imposed by the United Nations would be considered a "declaration of war".

Fearing that any UN sanctions might further isolate the Pyongyang regime and push the peninsula to the brink of war, China has until now resisted a council meeting. Last week, however, the Chinese ambassador to the United Nations said Beijing had agreed to hold initial consultations on the issue.

"We hope that we could have good coordination so hopefully we could accomplish something," Chinese Ambassador Wang Yingfan said.

While Beijing may stick to its longtime opposition to economic sanctions, indications are emerging that China is also stepping up pressure on North Korea. Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said last week that China was now making a substantial effort to persuade North Korea to accept a US demand for multi-nation regional talks.

Speaking from Washington, where he met Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney during a two-day visit, Downer provided a rare hint of behind-the-scenes diplomatic negotiations between major players on the issue in order to find a suitable security framework.

"There does seem to be now a clear sign that China is making a substantial effort to persuade the North Koreans, first of all to engage in multilateral dialogue and secondly to exercise a greater degree of restraint," Downer said.

A series of developments over the past few weeks indicate that Beijing is trying to build pressure on Pyongyang to stop the escalation of nuclear tension on the Korean Peninsula and seriously engage in dialogue.

According to diplomatic sources, Chinese officials, including Vice Foreign Minister Wang Yi, have been holding meetings with North Korean counterparts, trying to persuade Pyongyang in earnest to stop provoking the United States.

The message emphasized is that if Pyongyang did not curtail its provocative behavior, China might be forced to drop its longstanding opposition to sanctions if North Korea's nuclear development program formally comes to the UN Security Council.

While the threat of sanctions was only hinted at, Beijing made a point of its seriousness by cutting off oil supplies to North Korean for three days last month.

Diplomats say the pipeline from the Daqing oilfields in northeastern China to North Korea was temporarily shut down in early March shortly after Pyongyang test-fired a missile into waters between the Korean Peninsula and Japan.

Such punishment on Beijing's side has been long urged by Washington, and China has been increasingly criticized for continuing oil and food supplies despite then-president Jiang Zemin's discussions with Bush last year.

China is North Korea's main source of fuel, exporting an estimated 1 million tonnes of oil each year to Pyongyang. Any halt in supplies would be a severe blow to North Korea, where energy and food shortages have left the population on the brink of a humanitarian disaster.

Beijing cited "technical" problems for the oil cutoff, but it also served as a warning to Pyongyang in destabilizing regional security.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: madison46; Poohbah; Miss Marple
And it might not hurt to add in a new home port and staging base for Korea...

Officially, that is.
21 posted on 04/08/2003 12:59:10 PM PDT by hchutch ("But tonight we get EVEN!" - Ice-T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
[China] can influence, but not demand.

Without Chinese support, the NK regime would collapse. Perhaps you mean that they can't make demands because if they did make serious demands it might trigger a war?

22 posted on 04/08/2003 1:04:01 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
Certainly the whole range of offensive options is open to China if they chose to pressure North Korea. China pays off North Korea to keep them pointed south, but they refuse to pay more than a certain percentage. This may change, if they can't get us to come up with any food or energy.

China does not want the economic devastation that a war would bring to their already teetering economy. They also don't want North Korea to get too desperate, as Beijing is well within missile range. North Korea would not turn on China except as an absolute last resort, but the days of last resort will soon be upon them. Either we give them what they need to survive, or they will look elsewhere.

This is why China is so adamant that we deal with North Korea directly. The want North Korea to explode south, if it does at all. They will play silent partner to Kim Jong Il, if only out of concern for their own safety.

23 posted on 04/08/2003 1:14:09 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
The Chinese are simply going to have to reevaluate. I'm sure they'll start seeing the light when the Bush admin turns its focus to Korea after Iraq. They'll be caught between a rock and a hard place. Getting our soldiers out of range of NK guns is just the first move.
24 posted on 04/08/2003 1:28:00 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Recklessness = The USA not being blackmailed.

Recklessness = people in that region being responsible for their OWN security.

Recklessness = N. Korea's decisions, and that of their supporters (ie; China) if they don't stop the dangerous precedence being set into motion by the N. Koreans.
25 posted on 04/08/2003 1:49:04 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
This article is phony window dressing.

Yes. Asia Times spins things to make the ChiComs look responsible regularly.

26 posted on 04/08/2003 2:32:02 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
If America would stop feeding the commies they would all fall but we are fools and its our fault that the commies are still around! Since the 1920's maybe we have been fools!
27 posted on 04/08/2003 2:38:51 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Seeing your cartoon makes me wonder if OBL is hiding because he’s scared of other Muslim radicals. Maybe they’ve figured out his miscalutions are responsibable for destroying the Taliban and Saddam’s Iraq.
28 posted on 04/08/2003 4:55:20 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Well if the US is acting reckless, it's about time. I like to drive recklessly in rush hour traffic in a rental car. Try it some time.
29 posted on 04/08/2003 5:02:00 PM PDT by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
Agree. If this is "recklessness".. it was a long time coming and sorely needed. Time to redefine the word!!

:o)

Perhaps Websters Dictionary should change "recklessness" to mean: Showing courage, showing decisiveness, intelligence. Laying responsibility where it SHOULD be. Moral fortitude.

Now as to driving that rental car recklessly in traffic,.. well thats kind of akin to what the N. Korean Govt. is doing with the "peoples" car (car = their country) isn't it? LOL

FRegards, Vets
30 posted on 04/08/2003 5:29:47 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Must see. "All Your Iraq Belong To U.S.", here>
31 posted on 04/08/2003 5:50:54 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
the only thing Communists respond to is force

They used to have a saying during the cold war,
"Advance to the point of the Bayonette!"
32 posted on 04/08/2003 5:55:02 PM PDT by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Indonesia
33 posted on 04/12/2003 2:27:55 PM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson