Skip to comments.
Beijing's SARS Attack
Time ^
| Susan Jakes
Posted on 04/08/2003 11:00:59 AM PDT by Nov3
Beijing's SARS Attack
Doctor and party member insists there are many more cases than officials will admit
BY SUSAN JAKES / BEIJING
GUANG NIU/REUTERS A facemask-wearing couple pass a billboard in Beijing. How many cases are unreported? |
|
|
Tuesday, April 8, 2003
A physician at Beijing's Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (No. 301) in a signed statement provided to TIME, says that at one Beijing hospital alone, 60 SARS patients have been admitted of whom seven have died. That indicates the number of patients infected with SARS in Beijing may be significantly higher than those totals made public by China's Ministry of Health. Last Thursday Chinese Minister of Health Zhang Wenkang announced to the press that China's capital had seen just 12 cases of SARS of whom three had died. Today's edition of the official China Daily put the number of SARS infections in Beijing at 19 with four dead. The doctor, Jiang Yanyong, 72, told TIME today he wrote the statement because he feels that "a failure to disclose accurate statistics about the illness will only lead to more deaths." Jiang says medical staff in Beijing's military hospitals were briefed about the dangers of SARS at the beginning of the National People's Congress in early March, but told not to publicize what they'd learned lest it interfere with the annual meeting of China's rubber-stamp legislative body. This has been confirmed by another physician at a Beijing-area hospital.
<p><!--
<p>/*style for rightside text in right column */
<p>.boxtext { font-size: 11px; line-height: 16px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica color: #FFFFFF }
<p>.dropdown { font-size: 10px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica }
<p> -->
<p>
After watching Zhang Wenkang's televised press statement last week, Jiang says he spoke to doctors and nurses at three Beijing military hospitals who expressed surprise and anger at the Minister's statement. As of today, Jiang says doctors at Beijing's No. 309 PLA Hospital told him they are treating 60 SARS patients and that seven patients have died of SARS. A duty officer at the No. 309 hospital reached for comment tonight said he "wasn't clear about this matter" and refused to provide information about SARS patients at the hospital. The following are translated excerpts of Jiang's statement:
"On April 3rd, China's Minister of Health announced to the press that the Chinese government was already diligently dealing with the problem of SARS, and that the spread of the disease was already under control. He said that Beijing had 12 SARS cases and that three had died of the disease. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. The next day when I went to the hospital all the doctors and nurses who had seen Zhang's statement were furious. As a doctor who cares about people's lives and health, I have a responsibility to aid international and local efforts to prevent the spread of SARS.
This is what I learned from my colleagues:
Around the time of the convening of the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, Beijing's No. 301 Hospital admitted an old man. At the time he was very ill and thought to be possibly suffering from SARS. He was therefore sent to Beijing's No. 302 Hospital (an infectious diseases hospital) for treatment. At that time the doctors at No. 302 Hospital didn't have experience with the disease. In the process of treating him 10 doctors and nurses were infected with SARS. The old man was very sick and died two days after entering the hospital. His wife was admitted soon afterward and also died. Only at this time did officials from the Ministry of Health call a meeting of hospital leaders to inform them that Beijing now had cases of this disease, but that in order to ensure stability as the nation's two annual legislative assemblies got underway, hospital officials were forbidden to publicize what they'd learned about SARS.
That day after watching the Minister's statement, I telephoned colleagues at the No. 309 People's Liberation Army hospital. They had also seen the news and said that Zhang's statement was outrageous. As of yesterday their hospital (which the PLA general logistics department had designated its main hospital for SARS) had already admitted 60 SARS patients of whom 7 had died. Because No. 309 is already full to capacity the PLA general logistics department has again asked the No. 302 PLA Hospital to admit more patients. On April 6th the No. 302 PLA Hospital admitted five severely ill patients from the People's Armed Police."
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: amoygardens; jiangyanyong; reporting; sars; sarschina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
12 official cases in Bejing. Yet really 60 at ONE hospital in Bejing not including the transfers! The Chinese are lying through their teeth. I wonder how many cases their really are in China.
I am glad the war is going on. This story would be whipped into a frenzy.
1
posted on
04/08/2003 11:00:59 AM PDT
by
Nov3
To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections
|
|
Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
04/08/2003 11:03:04 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Nov3
It should be whipped into a frenzy. The Chinese are clearly hiding a major health disaster, one that threatens to embarass and discredit them once the truth becomes known. Their feeble health care infrastructure can't possibly be up to the task of dealing with this disease on their own, and thier own pride prohibits them for asking for help. Were it not a threat to their economic stability, they'd likely just let their people die off.
3
posted on
04/08/2003 11:08:14 AM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
To: Nov3
4
posted on
04/08/2003 11:10:42 AM PDT
by
blam
To: Steel Wolf
.........threatens to embarass and discredit them....... NO! Say it ain't so!
I thought state-run health-systems were supposed to be the most desirable form of healthcare in the world.
Hillary said so!
5
posted on
04/08/2003 11:13:32 AM PDT
by
DoctorMichael
(FReepers.....An army to be reckoned with.)
To: Steel Wolf
It should be whipped into a frenzy. I don't want to see the economy hurt even further by this. That being said I bet thousands if not 10's of thousands have died in China.
6
posted on
04/08/2003 11:14:11 AM PDT
by
Nov3
To: Nov3
Our economy could take a little damage off of this. The Chinese could see the bulk of their foriegn investment dry up and vanish, setting their economic development back decades. Not only the disease itself, but the fact that the Chinese leadership would be so ineptly bold as to even try to hide it will scare off investors left and right. They've got no one to blame but themselves on this.
7
posted on
04/08/2003 11:19:31 AM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
To: Nov3
There's a lot. My friend is from Beijing and her parents still live near Beijing University. I was with her last week when she called them to see if they were ok. They told her that four people living near them had come down with it and they had been given preventative medication.
8
posted on
04/08/2003 11:20:13 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: Steel Wolf
You nailed it. The true face of Red Chinese Communism is on display for the whole world to see.
To: Mother Abigail
Ping
10
posted on
04/08/2003 11:27:33 AM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: twigs
They told her that four people living near them had come down with it and they had been given preventative medication. There is no preventative medication. This is simply being done to keep people calm.
11
posted on
04/08/2003 11:43:00 AM PDT
by
EternalHope
(Chirac is funny, France is a joke.)
To: Steel Wolf
I'm still wondering if they are hiding something very very bad like they know exactly what it is and how it came to be.
To: Nov3
Beijing has SARS now? This would be trouble for the high-profile Olympics and a lot of other ordinary things.
13
posted on
04/08/2003 11:51:23 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts)
To: mtbopfuyn
I think it is a lot more likely that this is a case of incompetence and carelessness rather than one of conspiracy.
14
posted on
04/08/2003 12:01:30 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
To: RightWhale
This would be trouble for the high-profile Olympics and a lot of other ordinary things. I forgot about the Olympics.
15
posted on
04/08/2003 12:26:25 PM PDT
by
Nov3
To: EternalHope
There is no preventative medication. That's interesting.
16
posted on
04/08/2003 12:52:28 PM PDT
by
twigs
To: Nov3
Olympics is the major reason Beijing has been wearing the happy face lately. They're putting Taiwan talk and other belligerent talk on the back burner, learning foreign cultures and languages, trying to become relevant in outer space exploration, moderninzing the toilets, all kinds of stuff. Olympics is a big part of the reason.
17
posted on
04/08/2003 1:09:00 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts)
To: Nov3
This has the potential to be Red China's Chernobyl.
To: twigs
Maybe you could ask your friend what preventative medicine was given to her parents.
There's plenty about this problem we don't know about yet.
19
posted on
04/08/2003 4:56:15 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: blam
On a different note, since I saw you on this thread, I was reading an article in Discover that I thought you would be interested in. You might want to pick up a copy of the May issue and check out:
Ancient America's Culture of War
They only have the first paragraph or two posted but I thought it was a very interesting read.
20
posted on
04/08/2003 6:17:52 PM PDT
by
Sawdring
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson