Replies

Scott Ritter is a piece of trash. At another web site where he posts with William Pitt, I posted that same story and question part and I was slamming him for the pervert charges Scott came on using his site name of Karl Kammeron and said this to mw.....

Karl Kammeron aka (Scott Ritter)
Chef

posted 01-19-2003 02:29 PM
---

quote:
........
Originally posted by tlbshow:
You've spoke about having seen the children's prisons in Iraq. Can you describe what you saw there?
----

Rest assured, Toddie, what Scott would describe is nowhere as horrible as the sight of you trying to hit on Hartwick coeds in downtown Oneonta!

When CNN's people are given "FR"audulent information about Pitt, and then learn they've been lied to (that's right, LIED to by a thug activist who hates Pitt and doesn't give a flying shit about facts), they are not happy. And a lot of people are quickly becoming interested in your role in furthering this smear campaign against Pitt and Ritter. The NY Times Wash Post and other major media outlets are not touching the story. Daily News did not carry it in their print edition yesterday or today (hmmmmmmm).

You see, Todd, you have two big problems:

1: You have a really bad habit of talking too much online and telling -- or promoting -- lies and smears.

2: More people than you can imagine now know who you are because of your own online sloppiness.

Time to come clean, Todd. What is your role in this, and who has been sending you information on what is starting to look like an orchestrated smear of Ritter?

From the Time article:

Did you write a report, at the time you were doing inspections in Votkinsk in the Soviet Union in 1988 that said the group your wife worked for was full of spies?

No. I indicated that given past models of Soviet penetration techniques that these young girls, of which my wife was one, who were brought in by the Soviets to carry out translation services had been used in the past to attempt sexual compromise. I subsequently wrote a series of reports that said this did not appear to be the case in Votkinsk. In fact, because of the human intelligence work I did in the Soviet Union I was able to ascertain that the girls were actually dissatisfied with the Soviets. They showed a tendency to speak out against the KGB to the U.S. inspectors.

I suspect the reason for Ritter's sudden aboutface was that he was in fact compromised by the Soviets through these women and maybe even his wife. With Saddam giving him $400,000 and the Soviets (now Russia) having compromising videos, it is easy to see how Scotty may have had a change of heart.