All the same, what is the solution to be offered, if it is not a police-state occupation of these territories indefinitely?
Once again, the premise here is false. The police state and occupation exist... East of the Jordan.
The solution should be the Historically precedented loss of the West Bank and Gaza by the "palestinians," once one of their ongoing acts of war precipitates a Just War by Israel in response. The Arab aggressors would appropriately and finally lose the territory they currently occupy.
The police-state solution has shown that it comes at the costs of hundreds of human lives every year. To most of the world, that is appalling. That's why everyone else is pushing for the establishment of some sort of state.
There is already a state, it's called Jordan. The world clamors for a second palestinian state, to reward terror, for many reasons. Anti-Semitism is not the least of them.
Comments about Jordan are irrelevant. I want to know what you want to see happen to the millions of Arabs living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Just come on out and say it instead of hiding behind obscure sentences. Are you just hoping all the Palestinians "disappear"? What do you propose to do to them?
And I'm curious to how Israel will make a just war against people in a land it already occupies. Will it go and shoot them all for daring to live in their own houses under Israeli occupation? By Arabs occupying the land, do you refer to the fact of their living in houses they have legal title to in the West Bank?
Out of curiosity, is it possible, in your view, that Israel could ever be involved in an unjust war?
I'm just curious if you are a genocidal maniac Nazi wannabe wanting to kill all the Palestinians or merely looking for an opportunity to create millions of more refugees for the rest of the world to deal with so you can cement your membership status in the Milosevic Ethnic Cleansing Club.
What are so-called uncapitalized "palestinians"? Are they related to so-called uncapitalized "jews" or "isrealis"? Are you trying to peddle the theory that "palestinians" are really "Bosnians" or some such?
Can you explain to me why anything in the history of the past 50 years is relevant to the legal and moral right of people to live in houses and on land that they own?