Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jriemer
This is the last conflict in which journalist embedding will even be an issue. There are no more 400 mile blitzkreigs featuring 325,000 theatre personnel, and 125,000 in country warriors in our future. This thing presented monumental challenges and lethal risks that had to be accepted and overcome. The major potential damage to our initial plan that was sucker punched to our 4th ID by Turkey was mitigated by the fortunate and bold strike on Saddam and his sons on the eve of the ground advance. The Iraqis mounted no concerted defense save propaganda from day one.

There's no other place on Earth like this. Not North Korea or Syria or Iran or Mexico or Indonesia. Not Russia or China or Phillipines. This is a regime bolstered by institutions of terror and significant resources that perfected their tactics and threat capability for 30 years. They've exploited cynical international political and diplomatic cover. They operate absent any larger State survival interest, and thus are without all hurdles to the use of mass destruction weaponry and strategic civilian slaughter. We needed to seize and occupy this territory, and kill the murderers who threaten everyone and everything.

Going forward, it's going to be about CIA street assets, Spec Ops targeting precision Air Force and Naval Air assaults, Airborne and Marine quick strike units with light artillery and armor designed to destroy enemy terror cells in heavily populated 3rd World urban centers and undeveloped and rugged wastelands.

This is the last time we're lining up like this. We couldn't possibly afford to wait for the Heavy Armor like the Wesley Clarks and Hugh Sheltons demanded, we'd still be waiting in Kuwait City for the 4th ID to stage their parade and the Hussein boys would have fortified their command and the Fedayeen Saddam and Al Qaida/Hizbollah hitmen would be entrenched and everywhere.

The journalists won't have the forewarning or long-term stories to springboard from in our future military operations. They're going to have to get the news of our projection of military prerogatives straight from the fiction writers at Reuters, Al Jazeera, New York Times and the BBC. We didn't nip Saddam in the bud when we should have. Future Saddam's are non-starters.

Baghdad still is frought with peril and deadly risk but .... now about that Pyongyang cancer ...

64 posted on 04/08/2003 11:34:09 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: ArneFufkin
I appreciate your many thoughtful posts on this thread.

Regarding embeds, I remain of two minds. In the final analysis I'd come down on the side of press access, but I know that journalists will face competitive challenges by taking yet greater risks; all for the sake of circulation.

It's a conundrum; somewhat like war itself, I suppose.
66 posted on 04/08/2003 11:53:41 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: ArneFufkin
I disagree. The tactics for urban warfare are taking a turn towards "Panzer/Grenadier". Our ground force structure will evolve to a somewhat lighter, faster TO&E, but this actually reinforces Blitzkrieg. The terrain and strategic objectives of Iraqi Freedom, though somewhat unique are my no means exclusive. We will mount similar campaigns in the future...no doubt.
73 posted on 04/08/2003 2:12:32 PM PDT by USMA83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson