Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twntaipan
This would be consistent with the earlier reports that it may be a "chlamydia-like" agent, although chlamydia itself evidently encompasses an airborne variation as well. I have no medical expertise whatsoever and I'm by no stretch qualified to evaluate anything of this sort, really. This is just my random observation.. ;)
5 posted on 04/08/2003 12:19:35 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv; All
I'm spending almost all of my online time with the war, BUT

Chlamydia come in sexually-transmitted and non-sexually transmitted types. The most prevalent non sexually transmitted species is Chlamydia pneumoniae which, as you might imagine, causes pneumonia.

Since the "case definition" of SARS will capture large numbers of pneumonia cases who don't really have SARS, it's not surprising that some cases of pneumonia caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae are showing up.

What this has to do with STDs is-nothing.

The evidence that a novel virus, probably a coronavirus, is the singular cause of SARS is quite strong.

20 posted on 04/08/2003 4:59:34 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson