Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox
I guess that "indirect" assassination of foreign leaders is not covered in the order, i.e. bombing a "military" target where the foreign leader might be having dinner.

For example, the bombing of Libya in 1986. Gadhaffi escaped but he got the message. He's been quiet ever since.

Sending an assassination team to only kill Gadhaffi would have been against the current executive order. Of course, the President can sign a new executive order and override the non-assassination order.

833 posted on 04/07/2003 8:01:19 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]


To: george wythe
And didn't Bush already write one that removed the constraints of that executive order - something to do with "Going after those who order others to kill..." or something like that?
853 posted on 04/07/2003 8:04:54 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Some days, it's just not worth gnawing through the straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson