Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US marines discover "PLF faction's bomb-making facility" in Iraq
ProLog ^ | Monday, 07-Apr-2003 9:20AM | AFP

Posted on 04/07/2003 2:57:54 PM PDT by Smogger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: ApesForEvolution
An "Apparent" Suicide
Terrorist Abu Nidal dies in Iraq after he shoots himself in the head. Four times.
by Victorino Matus, The Weekly Standard
09/10/2002 12:00:00 AM


Victorino Matus, assistant managing editor





LAST SUNDAY on "Meet the Press," as Vice President Dick Cheney answered Tim Russert's questions about Iraq, Halliburton, and his political future, one thing was mentioned that deserves further exploration:

"We know that Saddam Hussein has, over the years, been one of the top state sponsors of terrorism for nearly 20 years," Cheney said. "We've had this recent weird incident where the head of the Abu Nidal organization, one of the world's most noted terrorists, was killed in Baghdad. The announcement was made by the head of Iraqi intelligence. The initial announcement said he'd shot himself. When they dug into that, though, he'd shot himself four times in the head. And speculation has been, that, in fact, somehow, the Iraqi government or Saddam Hussein had him eliminated to avoid potential embarrassment by virtue of the fact that he was in Baghdad and operated in Baghdad. So it's a very complex picture to try to sort out."

The picture is complex, but it's more than just a "weird incident," and a recent, exhaustive report from "Jane's World Insurgency and Terrorism" sheds some light on this Middle Eastern murder mystery. We learn that Abu Nidal (whose name means "Father of the Struggle") was indeed murdered by Saddam Hussein's henchmen. The reason was not "to avoid potential embarrassment by virtue of the fact that he was in Baghdad," but rather, that Abu Nidal was an enemy of the state and was plotting to help overthrow Saddam's regime. According to the highly respected "Jane's," with the aid of official and nonofficial sources in Ramallah, Amman, Baghdad, London, Washington, and Beirut, "the Iraqi dictator is now feeling the pressure from the ongoing U.S. deliberations over a potential invasion to topple his regime. In any such adventure, the anti-Saddam elements within Iraq would most likely okay an important role in turning the tide against Saddam. He has therefore moved to eradicate those dangerous elements, both as a preemptive measure to protect his position and as an example to other prospective internal enemies still at large."

So how does Abu Nidal, whose faction was once termed by the State Department as "the most dangerous terrorist organization in existence," lose favor with Saddam Hussein, perhaps the most hated dictator in the world? Although Abu Nidal had done "jobs" for Hussein in the 1970s and '80s, he lost favor when he sided with Kuwait and the Saudis during the Gulf War. Even more damning, according to the "Jane's" investigation, Iraqi agents claimed to have found "classified documents and plans concerning a U.S. attack" in his Baghdad apartment.

Still, it's one thing for Saddam to suspect Abu Nidal of being an enemy of the state; it's entirely another thing to assume he would help America with its goal of "regime change." After all, from 1973 to 1994 Abu Nidal had masterminded some of the worst acts of terror in the Middle East and Europe. His victims have included both Jews and Palestinians, Europeans and Americans.

ABU NIDAL was originally named Sabri Khalil al-Bana. Like Osama bin Laden, he came from a wealthy family. Born in 1937 in the port town of Jaffa, al-Bana later became a Gaza refugee in 1948 and ended up in Nablus in the West Bank. He worked as both a teacher and an electrician. Most of all, he was a fervent believer in a Palestinian state--and not one that coexisted side-by-side with Israel. He served willingly under Yasser Arafat, having joined forces with him in 1960, and soon became a high-ranking diplomat in Khartoum and Baghdad. But the difference in visions between Arafat and Nidal would lead to a split in 1974 (Nidal was supported on this move by then-Iraqi vice president Saddam Hussein). He then set up his Fatah Revolutionary Council and embarked on a struggle to bring death to Israel and those Palestinians who might have been willing to compromise.

One of his early acts of terror remains his deadliest--the 1974 bombing of a TWA commercial airliner going from Israel to Greece. All 88 people on board perished. In 1978, the FRC murdered Said Hammami and Izzadin Kalak, the PLO representatives to, respectively, London and Paris. In 1983, they assassinated Issam Sartawi, a PLO diplomat stationed in Lisbon. In 1985, FRC terrorists attacked El Al airport counters in Rome and Vienna--simultaneously--killing 19 and wounding 120. The following year, an Istanbul synagogue was hit, leaving 22 more dead. In 1991, an FRC hitman murdered Salah Khalaf, Arafat's second-in-command. (Arafat issued a death sentence to Abu Nidal, and, from time to time, attempted to patch things up with him--to no avail.)

There are a string of other terrorist acts in which Abu Nidal is implicated--from the 1986 bombing of the La Belle disco in Berlin to Pan Am Flight 103, which crashed over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988. (All told, he may be responsible for more than a thousand deaths.) But perhaps his biggest act was an assassination plot that failed: the 1982 attempt on the life of Israel's ambassador to London, Shlomo Argov. It became a pretext for the Israeli invasion of Lebanon--and what Nidal undoubtedly hoped would be the final showdown between the Jews and the Palestinians. In 1988, with his situation deteriorating, Abu Nidal conducted his own Night of the Long Knives, purging 156 of his own FRC members after getting wind of a plot to oust him.

Throughout all of these years, Nidal also found himself moving from place to place, like an ordinary mercenary on the run. He went from the West Bank to Saudi Arabia, then to Jordan, Sudan, and Baghdad. In 1983, Iraq expelled him and he landed in Syria. Then Libya. Then Egypt. And finally back to Baghdad around 1999.

It was reported that Abu Nidal went to Iraq for cancer treatment (which speaks volumes about his predicament since, to put it delicately, Iraq ain't Switzerland). Apparently it was thought that, for all the work he had done for the regime in the past, the Iraqis "owed" him. And so he set up an office with a guard and an apartment--which is where Iraqi intelligence supposedly arrested him this summer on August 14. But here there are two extremely divergent sides to the story.

First the account as provided to reporters by Tahhir Jalil Haboush, chief of Iraqi intelligence: Officials appeared at the doorstep of Nidal's apartment with orders to bring him to court. As "Jane's World Insurgency and Terrorism" relays, "when the security officers arrive at his home, Abu Nidal said he needed to go to his bedroom to change his clothes. Haboush said a shot was fired, and the officers found that Abu Nidal had shot himself in the mouth. He was then rushed to the hospital where he died eight hours later."

But Palestinian sources in Ramallah told "Jane's" quite a different story, saying that Abu Nidal "had set up plans to target a senior Iraqi official and that his group received $4 million from an Arab country for the operation. It was this . . . that prompted Iraqi intelligence to order the assassination of Abu Nidal and the arrest of his assistants." Palestinian sources also reported that Nidal's body "bore several gunshot wounds," thus casting doubts on the idea of a suicide.

If the Palestinian sources are to be believed, two questions linger: Which Arab state was helping Nidal? Who was the targeted official?

Victorino Matus is an assistant managing editor at The Weekly Standard.

61 posted on 04/07/2003 7:49:31 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution; cardinal4; Pearls Before Swine; piasa
Abu NIDAL, YES!

What kind of fool am I!
62 posted on 04/07/2003 7:50:59 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
LOL! Yes, persistence pays...
63 posted on 04/07/2003 8:23:06 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Thank you. Very insightful.
64 posted on 04/07/2003 8:24:18 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Is that a rhetorical question Bill?
65 posted on 04/07/2003 8:24:49 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
D'OH! Don't answer!
66 posted on 04/07/2003 8:26:46 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Earl B.
And where are the WMD? I've been harping on this point for several days now, and get ridiculed by Freepers. But where are they? The US gov't sold this war as a preemptive strike to take out the WMD before Saddma got his toys ready to play with. But they haven't found anything. Yesterday, the military thought they had discovered materials for making sarin nerve agent. Today, it turns out to have been pesticide. A US army spokeman, General Vincent Brooks said that they haven't found anything. If Saddam did have WMD, why didn't he use them by now? The guy is crazy enough, and wouldn't mind gassing his own people to take out US troops, afterall, it's for the greater (ie HIS) good. somethin is wrong here.
67 posted on 04/07/2003 8:33:30 PM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
US Marines in Iraq have discovered bomb-making facilities at a facility described as a training camp operated by the a faction of the Palestine Liberation Front (PLF), a military spokesman said Monday.

I thought Saddam had no links to terrorists whatsoever, besides having no WMD of course.

68 posted on 04/07/2003 9:07:11 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
I thought Saddam had no links to terrorists whatsoever, besides having no WMD of course.

Curses! He musta been framed by those no-good PLFers.




69 posted on 04/07/2003 9:11:22 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
LOL!
70 posted on 04/07/2003 9:12:37 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
From Five Big Lies In The War With Iraq, click link to view rest of article...

Lie Number Five: Iraq has no link to terrorists.

Complete and utter hogwash. For many years, the Iraqi government has given shelter to the Palestinian Liberation Front of Abu Abbas, famous for the hijacking of the Achille Lauro, an Italian cruise ship, and the murder of Leon Klinghoffer, a wheel-chair bound, elderly passenger. Many of their terrorist activities were directed specifically at Israel, and most of their efforts failed, at best. In 1996, Abbas, in concert with Yassar Arafat, agreed to accept the Oslo Peace Accord; however, in November 2001, Israeli authorities arrested 15 members of a PLF cell. Several cell members admitted to receiving terrorist training in Iraq. The cell is reportedly responsible for the murder of Yuri Gushstein, an Israeli youth.

According to Israeli defense sources, the Palestinian Liberation Front is connected through Arafat to Hizballah, Hamas, Jihad Islami, and the Arab Liberation Front. Iraq also gives $25,000 rewards to terrorists and their families.

Now, which lie do you want me to believe again? ***

71 posted on 04/07/2003 9:20:04 PM PDT by TheWriterInTexas (God bless our Country, Troops, and President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Yep, yep, guess that about clinches that Iraq-terrorism connection, eh? Can't get more incriminating than that!

Brewww Hah hah ha hah hah !!!!!!!!!!!


72 posted on 04/07/2003 9:21:03 PM PDT by boltCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plusone
I would explain this to you, but you are not asking a serious question and I doubt you want the truth. Perhaps you thought the WMD would be on shelves carefully labled at large WMD shopping centers? Don't hold your breath hoping the US won't find them and that Bush will look bad. It ain't gonna happen so get your kleenex stocked up and be ready to boo hoo for a long time while the dems stay a minority.
73 posted on 04/07/2003 9:21:54 PM PDT by Reb Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the heads up!
74 posted on 04/07/2003 9:22:06 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Reb Raider
I like the tone of your reply!! :) I don't want the Dems back, good grief, we have enough problems. But every WMD siting that turns out to be something benign will make it that much harder for the pubbies. Freepers have been so busy cheerleading this war that they have forgetten the longer term. The battle isn't for Bagdad in 03, but DC in 04. If this doesn't go picture perfect, it will give the Dems a stick to beat the pubbies with. This is something that Freepers don't want to hear. The mistake that GW made is the same one made by his father. They both started their wars a year too soon. Bush senior left the Gulf War with an approval rating of 90% IIRC, yet lost the election. Why? Because there was a year in between for the patriotic glow to fade away, revealing in the shadows beneath the troubled economy. Bush Sr was always clumsy domestically, and with his broken promise on taxes (read my lips...thank you Ms Noonan!!) this sent Clintawn to the Whitehouse. It might happen again. Once this war is over, (soon I think) the patriotism will drop away and people will have the usual domestic concerns (all politics are local). Gore has already postioned himself with the "I would not have started this war, I would have let the inspectors do their job" speech. He and Hillary are positioning themselves for the 04 ticket, and if Bush stumbles, we will be stuck with them for 8 years...thanks to the duplicity of the major media. (This glorious fifth estate, the watchdog of the politicos, votes about 90% for the Dems. Such objectivism!!!)
75 posted on 04/07/2003 9:36:16 PM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dinok
DINOK WROTE: "You can take the anti-war idiots and show them all this, and they will say it was all planted."

Maybe they can tell us how those space-deprived tanks had any room to squeeze in a few dozen 55-gallon barrel drums of Sarin, etc. before the JOURNALISTS (who were RIDING ON BOARD) saw them? LOL < /sarcasm >

76 posted on 04/07/2003 9:39:39 PM PDT by Concerned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Just ANOTHER breach of UNSC resolution 687.......
77 posted on 04/07/2003 9:48:32 PM PDT by Teetop (democrats....... socialist.........whats the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plusone
Hmmm. Let's see. Sodom's regime killed as many or more people with WMDs, both his own civilians and warring Iranians, as he did without them. He kicked inspectors out some 5 years ago, while WMDs were STILL not destroyed...and those are only the ones we know of. Many published reports suggest that his WMD scientist and program directors were told to lie (direct communique intercepts) and others suggest that he murdered folk who could potentially squeel, while others were threatened with loss of family if they did. Still other reports have large caches of WMDs being transported to Syria. We have a country bigger than California where weapons could have been buried, tunnels and bunkers that haven't even been located yet. Thousands upon thousands of gas masks were issued to particular Iraqi troops, which could only be used to protect Iraqis from their own stockpiles, because the united States' military doesn't take Bio/Chem weapons into warfare.

You've been watching to CNN too much...
78 posted on 04/07/2003 10:15:23 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: plusone
"If this doesn't go picture perfect, it will give the Dems a stick to beat the pubbies with."

Do you get paid to worry? You're pretty good at it is all...
79 posted on 04/07/2003 10:18:31 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
No, I worry for free! I wish I got paid for it!! I don't doubt the evilness of Saddam, taking him out will not cost me any sleep. And is is quite possibe that he has these things. My concern is how this will all play for the election.
80 posted on 04/07/2003 10:21:34 PM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson