Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle
As a lawyer, I can say YES YES YES! It's great! I am not even going to evaluate the legal theory behind it (LOL) - I am just thrilled with the ruling. I worked over a year for a plaintiff's firm until I was forced to quit over an ethics situation, and I can't believe the vipers that make up the trial lawyers. (as a generalization, of course.)

I am now begging for a job and nearly broke, but not sorry I quit.
107 posted on 04/07/2003 4:16:53 PM PDT by lawgirl (Running from the Grand Ennui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: lawgirl
Just reading as a citizen, the judgement seems to be against cruel and unusual compensation, so I suppose it's good? Punitives still look huge, and this case hinges on that "mental anguish" caterwauling, which is pain and suffering, and not addressed.

I still look for everyone's premiums to increase, and the dishonest to prosper over the honest. At some point, we're all going to be uninsured. Then the lawyers won't love any of us anymore...

You'd think that the "golden goose" story could persuade some of them to slow down on their gorging.

If there are no limits, there will shortly be no insurance.

I hope you find good work, soon.

110 posted on 04/07/2003 4:25:21 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson