Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq War Generates Free Publicity for Russian Weapons
Frontpage Magazine ^ | 04-07-03 | Agency France Press

Posted on 04/07/2003 5:23:00 AM PDT by Norm640

The war in Iraq, which has seen stiff Iraqi resistance against US and British troops, has opened up market opportunities for Russian weapons used by Baghdad's forces, military experts said.

"We got a great advertising gift for our weapons in Iraq," Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov was quoted as saying by the Interfax-AVN news agency on Friday.

The conflict will "generate a surge in interest in anti-aircraft defences and radio-electronic equipment," predicted Alexander Nozdrachev, head of the state-run Russian Agency for Conventional Weapons, quoted by Interfax-AVN.

Russian weapons sales last year totalled 4.5 billion dollars (4.1 billion euros), concentrated mainly on just two countries, China and India, although Russia has expanded sales to other regions.

"The war is useful for Russia. The Iraqi army is creating publicity for Russian weapons," respected business daily Vedomosti commented recently.

"Old launch-grenades, anti-tank missiles and mines, as well as primitive anti-aircraft equipment" from Soviet times "are inflicting losses on the coalition forces," Vedomosti said.

US M1 Abrams battle tanks, the most advanced tank in the world, have been damaged by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades, the RPG-7s, and Malyutka anti-tank missiles, which were designed in the 1960s, defence analyst Konstantin Makienko said.

"The scandal around the Kornet anti-tank missiles could boost interest in these arms," added Makienko, from the Centre for Strategy and Technologies Analysis.

The United States has accused Russian firms of selling Iraq anti-tank missiles and satellite jamming devices as well as night-vision goggles, in violation of the UN embargo. Moscow has firmly denied the allegations.

One of the firms concerned hit back at Washington, accusing the United States of "trying to find a scapegoat because their bombs are not falling as accurately as they want."

"The US weapons have been the cause of many mistakes in Iraq," hitting their own forces or civilians, Makienko pointed out.

With significant ground operations in the Iraq war, the "demand for Russian tanks and anti-tank missiles will rise," predicted Ivan Safranchuk from the Centre for Defence Information.

This will be particularly the case in other members of Washington's "axis of evil," Iran and North Korea (news - web sites), who fear the United States will target them after Iraq, Marat Kenzhetayev from the Russian Centre for Disarmament Problems told Vedomosti.

Most in demand will be TOR-M1 Short-range Air Defence Missile Systems (SA-15 under NATO (news - web sites) classification) and S-300 surface-to-air missiles (SA-10 Grumble), from Syria, Iran, United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, according to Makienko.

According to some analysts, there has already been a surge in interest for Russian weapons at the IDEX-2003 arms exhibition, the biggest in the Middle East, which took place on the eve of the war in Abu Dhabi from March 16 to 20.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: amoral; armssellins; armstrading; coldwar; democracy; iraq; pride; proliferation; russia; us; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: Beck_isright
Hmm, again you seem to miss the usual point in your little reality: PKK, PLF, Hamas, Tamil Tigers, etc were all funded by the Soviets...but to you all Russians are communists...your type never changes...hell, at least with luck in a generation or two, your type will grow extinct.
121 posted on 04/07/2003 9:25:00 PM PDT by Stavka2 (Neocons, an oxymoron wrapped in a hypocrisy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
tide to= tied to
122 posted on 04/07/2003 9:25:44 PM PDT by Stavka2 (Neocons, an oxymoron wrapped in a hypocrisy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Destro
bump
123 posted on 04/07/2003 9:26:03 PM PDT by Stavka2 (Neocons, an oxymoron wrapped in a hypocrisy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2; No Left Turn
My life is endangered more from American allies the Pakistanis and the Saudis and not from anything modern Russia will do to me.
124 posted on 04/07/2003 9:40:11 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Norm640
It sounds like a bad endorsement for Russian weapons to me.

"Buy our weapons and lose a country in just three weeks. Due to the factor of possible loss, you must pay cash in advance, preferably American dollars but other currency will be considered."

125 posted on 04/07/2003 9:49:33 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Maybe you right. Old Russian weapon sucks against new American weapon. But, just a couple of new used Kornets produced a little paranoia in Washington.
126 posted on 04/07/2003 11:40:38 PM PDT by Yuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
And they are still being funded and supplied through your government. The fact that you are willing to defend the blatant lie is why my generation and the following ones will not trust Russia. Perhaps when your nation quits acting like it's still under the Soviet system, we'll believe you.

V


127 posted on 04/08/2003 1:49:27 AM PDT by Beck_isright (FLASH: CNN hires Baghdad Bob as new Operation Iraqi Freedom Military Analyst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
Prove one damned thing you said. Show where the Russian government signed off on Iraqi arms, on the Tamal Tigers (even though India is Russia's allie), Hamas, any of them...where is your proof? Ainty up or shut up.
128 posted on 04/08/2003 6:29:01 AM PDT by Stavka2 (Neocons, an oxymoron wrapped in a hypocrisy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
True, same goes for tanks and everything else. Even worse when the newest tank they have is 30 years old and an export model.

True, and a tank is no place to be without air superiority. We don't believe in a fair fight.

129 posted on 04/08/2003 12:47:27 PM PDT by illumini (AMERICA. Love her or leave her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Exactly. I say that if we exchange weaponry. Imagine. American weaponry we give to Iraqis and Iraqi arms we give to American troops. Then Americans will win even more anyway. Even with old aged Soviet types of arms. It is not weapon what wins wars. But resolve and training of troops.

True! However, I was just in South America where I learned from command level officers that they can get no support for their American aircraft. Most likely they will buy the Russian helicopters and fixed wing aircraft - fully supported by intermediaries. No accidents on the Mi-17 in Columbia. Blackhawk? Bad reputation.

130 posted on 04/08/2003 12:51:52 PM PDT by illumini (AMERICA. Love her or leave her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: illumini
Agree
131 posted on 04/08/2003 4:46:50 PM PDT by Yuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson