Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defeats dismay Arab media
The Daily Telegraph ^ | April 7, 2003 | Gerald Butt

Posted on 04/06/2003 4:28:48 PM PDT by MadIvan

Arab satellite news channels, broadcasting footage of advances by coalition forces on Baghdad, are beginning to question whether Saddam Hussein has put up a proper fight against the allied advances.

Throughout the Arab world there is a mood of disappointment. The initial resistance by Saddam's forces raised expectations that he would put up a tougher fight around the capital.

"Why is he letting the Arabs down now," a Lebanese caller asked a phone-in programme, "when his forces fought so bravely in the south of the country?"

A presenter on the Dubai-based al-Arabiya television network said the Iraqi leader had promised "surprises" that would inflict huge losses. "Why have we not seen the surprises?"

A military expert later wondered why the Iraqi army had not concentrated on attacking the allies' supply lines, rather than moving forces back to try to defend Baghdad. "Saddam's fedayeen should be attacking the trucks carrying food, water and fuel," he added.

"Why didn't Saddam order all the bridges to be blown up along the route to the capital?" another studio guest wondered.

Several Arab newspapers highlight the discrepancy between Iraq's assessment of the war and that of the coalition forces. "The information war is intensifying," said al-Sharq in Qatar. In Jordan, al-Rai asked "where the real truth lies amid the confusion and contradiction of the news reports?" Nevertheless, on its front page the paper's main headline read: "Iraq retakes Saddam airport."

The Lebanese daily al-Nahar went one better, saying that "Saddam led the attack to retake the airport", while Akhbar al-Khaleej in Bahrain said: "We have wiped out the invading forces at the airport."

But other Arab papers adopt a more realistic line, with al-Watan in Saudi Arabia declaring that "the Americans have taken the airport and the Iraqis have retreated into Baghdad".

Kuwait's Rai al-Am assessed the situation in three words: "Baghdad's last stand."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdaddefense; blair; bush; iraq; iraqifreedom; saddam; uk; us; viceisclosing; war; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
"Saddam's fedayeen should be attacking the trucks carrying food, water...." he added.

I see. So the Iraqis' fellow Arabs in the media want their own people to starve?

81 posted on 04/06/2003 5:19:05 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
As it is written that not a blade of grass blows in the wind, except by the will of Allah, does it nhot follow that the defeat of the Arabs is also the will of Allah?
82 posted on 04/06/2003 5:21:50 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
When Saddam is defeated, the street will revile him as a traitor.

Actually they will call him a Jewish agent. One thing the Arab cannot do is realize that they are inferior to others.

83 posted on 04/06/2003 5:22:06 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
They just don't get it do they? A more clueless bunch is hard to imagine...
84 posted on 04/06/2003 5:24:41 PM PDT by ConservativeConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
A liberal friend who has been calling this Bush's war noted the reporting about the ammo bunkers and how the same thing was turning up all over Southern Iraq, tons of munitions. I whimsically noted that it was a shame Saddam hadn't spent all that money on schools and welfare programs. Now the friend is convinced this war is justified.
85 posted on 04/06/2003 5:26:19 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

Comment #86 Removed by Moderator

To: Arkinsaw
"Their press misleads them to the heights of ecstasy and then reality falls on them. Yet they keep on believing their fake press over and over again."

Like Lucy yanking the football away from Charlie Brown just as he's going to kick it.
87 posted on 04/06/2003 5:29:39 PM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Surprise, surprise, surprise!!

88 posted on 04/06/2003 5:37:31 PM PDT by Frunabulax ("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramcat
Displaced Columbia professor? 39 posted on 04/06/2003 4:44 PM PDT by Ramcat

NO DOUBT !!

89 posted on 04/06/2003 5:40:55 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Check out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/885504/posts for what seems to be a sound reasoning of why the Iraqi army is all but impotent.
90 posted on 04/06/2003 5:50:30 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
I saw this addressed the other day.
You get the bridges all wired up with explosives,
which was the case on many of these bridges.
Then, you wait until all your forces are on your side of
the river to blow the bridge, before the enemy can cross.
Since this requires a knowledge of what is going on on the
battlefield and where the different forces are deployed,
the decision to blow a bridge has to come from a high
command level. With, the theory goes, the high command
decapitated at the start of the war, and understanding
the total lack of initiative bred into commanders in a
dictatorship, there was no one to give the order.
The bridges remained intact.
91 posted on 04/06/2003 5:50:36 PM PDT by gcruse (If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I think I will join you.

*snicker snicker snicker*
92 posted on 04/06/2003 5:51:09 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Saddam: The BagLady of BagDad
93 posted on 04/06/2003 5:52:24 PM PDT by sourcery (The Oracle on Mount Doom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
In the gutter of the world, the "arab street" wakes up to realize that the truth is a motherf*&ker.
94 posted on 04/06/2003 5:58:55 PM PDT by wasp69 (The time has come.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: Bluntpoint
Hey Blunt,

Just went over to DU's Latest Breaking News thread for a peek. Gad, you should see a little of it:

Nambe posted: "(Dixie Chicks)...Turns out the whole thing was orchestrated by the National Republican Party. Party operatives spammed thrir (sic) email lists the day after Maines made her statement, urging them to contact radio stations."

Gad, I didn't get my e-mail!

LyndaG posted: "Natalie Maines has real courage. I read on one of those entertainment websites that she said recently that the more flak she receives for those comments, the prouder she is. Bless her!!!"

Maudlin posted: "If I were a Dixie Chick- I'd be on the phone to a lawyer right now. Either that or standing in front of a mirror naked, haven't made up my mind."

Glad I don't have to look in her mirror!

Democat posted: "...The right wing owns the media in the U.S. and the left has no chance of getting any real power until that is changed.
Even if, somehow, a Democrat could win the White House, the media would destroy them just like they tried to do to Clinton..."

Wow, is this one out to lunch!

aquart posted: "It's always been like this. The press, now the media, has never been liberal. Only the rich can afford to own a newspaper.
Reporting has always been like this. Actually, it's gotten a bit better. I had to research 1875 newspapers once and they put the editorials right into the news articles. I was quite shocked at the brazenness of it."

"a quart" new ID should add "low" at the end.

snippy posted: "There is a definite and well organized political strategy in the republican party to campaign on the basis that democrats are not good Americans. It is based on the success of the campaign to convince Germans that jews were not good Germans in the 1930's."

Yep, just like DU protests.

96 posted on 04/06/2003 6:01:51 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Has anyone noticed how the Coalition Forces have changed the Republican Guards into the Democrat Guards, i.e. losers?
97 posted on 04/06/2003 6:08:22 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The bridges remained intact.

True and I don't think that it helped them that Tommy Franks had his mech divisions do a Roadrunner. What's Arabic for "what was that".

98 posted on 04/06/2003 6:09:27 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
That makes sense.

99 posted on 04/06/2003 6:13:08 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
I even heard one not to long ago deny that the 6 day war even occurred.

More than one. Also denial of the original Arab-Israel war. Never happened.

100 posted on 04/06/2003 6:18:12 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson