To: biblewonk
What is your point? If science is blind and impotent when it comes to proving the supernatural, then the supernatural is non sequitur in a discussion of logical fallacies. The discussion of the application of logic is only valid within the parameters that can be applied.
877 posted on
05/12/2003 10:49:34 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: tacticalogic
What is your point? If science is blind and impotent when it comes to proving the supernatural, then the supernatural is non sequitur in a discussion of logical fallacies. The discussion of the application of logic is only valid within the parameters that can be applied. "scientific method" is one of the first things mentioned in the article.
879 posted on
05/12/2003 10:53:28 AM PDT by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson