[Quix]

The null hypotheses, of course, being that:

There were NO differences between the groups on the variables . . . with a 0.001 level of confidence, as I recall.

I think maybe the hypothesis about the construct systems a la George Kelly's work/grid did not show a sufficient difference to void the null hypothesis. The rest, I recall, did.

One of the other variables that did show a significant difference was on empathy as measured by the Comrey.

And I think on ORDERLINESS VS lack of compulsiveness also showed significant differences.

I forget the other variable I analyzed.

Dredging my memory is not that hard a work--given that it still works somewhat. LOL.

[Hank Kerchief]

There were NO differences between the groups on the variables . . . with a 0.001 level of confidence, as I recall.

I think maybe the hypothesis about the construct systems a la George Kelly's work/grid did not show a sufficient difference to void the null hypothesis. The rest, I recall, did.

One of the other variables that did show a significant difference was on empathy as measured by the Comrey.

Oof! I hope dredging up such, "memories," provide you some kind of satisfaction.

The only point I find interesting is the figure, 0.001, which I think is high, if a percentage of religious beliefs that are likely to be true were meant.

Thanks for that, anyway.

I liked your pervious post more, because, I agree, with your bias, "people are worth it." However, I am very selective about which people that means.

Hank