Skip to comments.
Logical Fallacies, Formal and Informal
The Autonomist ^
| March, 2003
| Reginald Firehammer
Posted on 04/06/2003 10:12:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880, 881-892 last
To: biblewonk
There is no immediate consequence on earth for rejecting it but there is later. How do you know that?
Hank
To: biblewonk
When you are limited to the optical part of the spectrum ... But, we are not. If we were, we would not know the visusal part of the spectrum is not the entire spectrum. The senses are not a limit to knowledge, they are the only means to knowledge. The senses are not knowledge, they are awareness (and the only awareness we have) of reality. Knowledge is what we come to understand about that reality we are conscious of.
Hank
To: tacticalogic
Yes it is. Where is "supernatural" found? "Round and round" Ratt.
883
posted on
05/12/2003 11:14:34 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: Hank Kerchief
How do you know that? Not by science or reason. I guess that only leaves faith.
884
posted on
05/12/2003 11:16:07 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: biblewonk
"Round and round" Ratt.Can't get there from here, can you?
885
posted on
05/12/2003 11:30:47 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: biblewonk
Not by science or reason. I guess that only leaves faith.Shouldn't that be enough?
886
posted on
05/12/2003 11:37:49 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: tacticalogic
Shouldn't that be enough? Definitely.
887
posted on
05/12/2003 11:42:14 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: biblewonk
Then why all the angst over something that is of no consequence to it?
888
posted on
05/12/2003 11:56:36 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: biblewonk; tacticalogic
Not by science or reason. I guess that only leaves faith. So you just believe what you believe, with no evidence that it is true, and for no reason whatsoever. How is that any different from what any religious, superstitious, or psychotic person believes? They have exactly the same basis for their belief as you have for yours, nothing at all.
(By the way, do you think science is unable to discover the truth of anything? This article only pertains to what science can discover, and how to prove that, and nothing else. Since you believe faith and science belong to entirely different realms, your comments are irrelavent to the subject of this post. I think that is what tacticalogic has been trying to convey as well. He can correct me if I'm wrong.)
Hank
To: Hank Kerchief
Since you believe faith and science belong to entirely different realms, your comments are irrelavent to the subject of this post. I think that is what tacticalogic has been trying to convey as well. He can correct me if I'm wrong.I think you got it pretty well.
890
posted on
05/12/2003 12:36:00 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: tacticalogic
Then why all the angst over something that is of no consequence to it? Who has angst and who said there is no consequence?
891
posted on
05/12/2003 1:27:31 PM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: biblewonk
Who has angst and who said there is no consequence?You apparently do, and if your faith is independent of logic, how can logic be of any consequence to it?
892
posted on
05/12/2003 1:31:24 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880, 881-892 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson