Posted on 04/06/2003 9:34:52 AM PDT by Liz
I think Saddam/Stalin/Mao/Alinsky is/was/would be proud of how Hillary dealt with her nemesis, don't you?
"Fear, greed and vanity. These are the three great levers by which men are moved."
And the left has paid close attention, haven't they?
* Greed -- We must put a stop to George Bush's war on terrorism, so that money can be used for better purposes, such as "free" education, "free" income, "free" medical care and anything else you want for "free."
* Vanity -- you're just as deserving of high grades, school admission, professional licensure and six-figure income as anybody else, just because you exist.
1. God's strength is made perfect in our weakness as we rely on HIM, not on ourselves.
2. Humble ourselves before God and HE will lift us up.
3. Behold, God is at work creating a new heaven and a NEW EARTH in which there will be NO TRACE of Alinsky or any of his disciples who will all be in hell with their leader, the prince of darkness.
"If I be lifted up, I will draw all men unto me". Another "radical" gave that "rule" and it is one that neither Hitlery, nor Alinsky, nor Stalin, nor Saddam, nor all the gates of hell shall prevail against!
GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS, UNBELIEVABLE NEWS
compiled by James W. Harris
Hillary Clinton's Mystery Thesis
Recently syndicated columnist Jack Anderson was doing a story on Hillary Clinton, and in the process his staff requested a copy of her 1969 senior thesis from Wellesley College. It was a seemingly simple request, since normally college theses are public record, available to anyone.
Not, however, in this case. Anderson was told that the current Wellesley president had created a new rule in 1992. The new rule, Anderson says, is that "...the college would seal the senior theses of any Wellesley grads who were either the first lady or the president of the United States." (Perhaps not coincidentally, the president of Wellesley is a long-time friend of Mrs. Clinton's.)
Okay, Anderson asked, can you just tell us the *subject* of the paper? No. Well, was the new policy enacted at Clinton's request? Again, no answer.
Perplexed and intrigued, Anderson contacted Hillary's White House press corps. He was assured it was no big deal, and that he'd be sent a copy of the paper, along with an explanation of why it had been sealed. Several weeks passed, however, and no thesis appeared. Finally he was told that no copy would be coming -- and no explanation would be given.
Eventually Anderson and his staff discovered some answers on their own. Hillary's thesis, it turns out, was a critique of Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty" programs. Her conclusion: community-based government anti-poverty programs don't work.
Which may explain all the secrecy, since President Clinton recently called for federal funding for a number of... community-based government anti-poverty programs.
(Source: column by Jack Anderson and Jan Moller)
Where she followed Senator Brooke 'in attack mode'.
Anderson quotes her political science prof at Wellesley, Alan Schecter, as saying that by the late l960s his pupil had decided that the best radical strategy was to "'use the legal system' as an agent of change." She wasn't alone in that calculation. The long march of the left through the courtrooms was under way: the world would become a better place, courtesy of courtroom briefs, complaints and class action suits.
She declines the road that led to West 11th St and goes instead to Yale Law School. She works for John Doar, helping draft articles of impeachment against Nixon.
That's why I jumped onto your story!
Good Post..!
F_T_D
Communists got quite good at three steps forward, two steps back.
Hitlery is such a bitch, she'll never be as successful as Bill.
Bill proved an effective Lucifer, assuming a pleasing shape to enough to get elected to power.
That of course is Alinsky's advice, assume that camouflage, don't eat that ham sandwich in front of the Jewish rally.
Hitlery, being strident, dogmatic, unbending, fails this test at all times.
Hitlery is an it, ultimately defined as an aggressive lesbian per the anecdote of Gennifer Flowers straight from the traitorrapist's mouth (Passion & Betrayal, Emery Dalton, 1995, page 41, and elsewhere).
Thus she's blown through Alinsky's stern counsel to assume enough of the "square to get in the game".
And Hitlery further marginalized itself in the health care fiasco, demanding 99%, rather than compromising with the 30% advised by Alinsky.
The so-called ethical relativism of Alinsky and Hitlery distils to any lie for power.
Bill was a world-class parser, able to keep himself on the technically true side of lying.
Hitlery is continually forced to refuse comment with disdain, feign horror a la Lazio's gambit, or simply limp along with a cane, be it "you know" or "I wasn't involved" or "I'm sadly disappointed" by her obese excrescent brother, e.g.
Oddly enough Sharpton would be her natural ally at this time.
Sharpton is the demagogue most adept at the game, for he announces the emperor is naked, the so-called leaders of the left, from Hitlery to the killer of Kopechne are given a pass from the probing questions he fields.
Hitlery has failed serially to muddy-up and degrade George W. Bush, yet continues with the same attempts to personalize the target.
Hitlery failed to instill the "homeland security is a myth" poison, and is so befuddled for the next attack Simon & Schuster despairs of its book.
Rush Limbuagh has said Hitlery is waiting for a point in the Iraq war to back-date its check.
Hitlery's success relies upon the ability of Democrats to block an effective tax cut plus the ability of Democrats and the Democrat press to degrade the accomplishments of the Iraq campaign.
Democrats plus the UN, France, Germany, Russia, China and the leftist media were not enough to prevent the Iraq campaign, and are not likely to be able to suppress the U.S. economy to their communal advantage.
The barnyard animals who would not help bake the bread will now demand to eat it, and when denied will misrepresent its qualities.
From Hitlery we shall have the "myth of Bush's victory in Iraq"--we expect no less kooky a canard from the adultery denier hallucinating a "vast right-wing conspiracy".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.