Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prince Charles
This is ridiculous..

If you don't have enough evidence, that you can make avaliable, to secure a conviction.. Then why go to court in the first place?

Don't they know how bad it will look if the case collapses?

3 posted on 04/06/2003 1:24:40 AM PST by Jhoffa_ (Frodo sleeps with men...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jhoffa_
i have said this from the first, and it appears I was right.

ZM is not guilty of a crime that the civil justice system can prosecute him for, and convict him, without prostituting justice. (I suppose the courts could convict him and sentence him to death because they are on our side, but the courts are already politicized enough).

Moussaoui is guilty of violating the laws of war, in that he is clearly an enemy soldier (by his own admission), behind our lines and out of uniform. This is not a violation of the US Code and the federal Courts have no place in judging him.

My contention has been that he should have been taken at dawn on 9/12/01 to Rector Street in Manhattan and been put up against a wall and shot.

Since this was not done, the next best thing is for him to be turned over to the military for a court martial followed by a prompt execution.

It was a serious mistake to "indict" him for nonexistent crimes.

13 posted on 04/06/2003 5:45:19 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson