Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: not_apathetic_anymore
As bad as this sounds it is minimal compared to past wars. One statistic that sticks in my mind (was it from Lew Walt?) is that 25% of U.S. casualties in WWII and Korea were from accidents and friendly fire. That's a bunch. It took a lot of headknocking and a lot of unnecessary deaths to get the Generals to coordinate communications between services.

In the past incidents like this took hundreds or even thousands of lives per incident. In many cases it was kept quiet so as not to disturb homefront morale. Improving communication has significantly reduced the problem.
52 posted on 04/06/2003 3:24:36 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: MARTIAL MONK
thanks for the perspective on what its been in the past. I also got to thinking that since the total number of deaths is much lower than in other wars (WWII, Vietnam, etc) that the percentage of friendly fire may well be higher. I guess that says something good about how we've learned to protect our troops in general.
58 posted on 04/06/2003 8:19:19 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson