[JohnGalt]

The Chinese have put an estimated 115 million baby girls to death since 1950; don't you think its kinda silly to make a case that we should invade countries who treat their people badly?

Have you not figured out that there is an important political need to find evidence linking Saddam to 9/11 that will stand the scrutiny of the American press? The American people already knew he was a bad man, but they supported this war, if you were half awake and follow politics, because of the Presidents belief that Saddam was linked to al-Qaeda, a claim that MI-5 says has not be established.

Then we go to this camp in Northern Iraq, which the CIA pinpointed over a year ago, and now we have finally captured the camp. Its crucial that independent newsources, like that MSNBC link you provided, back-up or refute the government.

Whatever your opinion is of the war or Bush, the consquences of not finding a smoking gun will be a major issue in 2004. Thinking conservatives and our Friends at the Murdoch Empire, should be careful that they not becomes dupes to unnamed government sources less they lose their credibility in the eyes of the public. Perception is everything, and yet you don't seem to realize the political consquences of calling allegations 'evidence.'

[Darksheare]

It's kinda silly to sidestep an argument and go off on a tangent.
Besides, China has not yet directly killed any of our people in an act of war.

Unless you want to follow the 9/11 money trail.
Then, yes they did. They funded it as well.