Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2003 7:22:11 PM PST by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: annyokie
Good article. Bump for later reference.
2 posted on 04/04/2003 7:25:13 PM PST by ThJ1800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annyokie
France still hasn't been paid for the Nuclear Reactor that the Israeli Air Force blew up, and Russia hasn't been paid for the T-72 tanks that we're blowing up.

France and Russia need those oil field contracts to recoup their money, and that is why they don't want regime change in Iraq. New goverment means new contract bidding.

Hell, if we wanted Iraq's oil, we wouldn't be invading the country, we'd be lifting sanctions so we could BUY the oil.
3 posted on 04/04/2003 7:35:41 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annyokie
"All the while Saddam was encouraged to hold out by countries that made it clear that they would readily support a waiving of sanctions and anything else Saddam wanted in return for oil contracts and other financial benefits."

Its because of France, Germany and Russia that the sanctions were never allowed to produce a peaceful resolution to this conflict.

France, Germany, Russia and China considered Iraq their cake and for 12 years violated numerous UN sanctions in arming Iraq.

It was in their financial interests to keep sanctions on Iraq while at the same time violating them.

Only those that stood with us should be allowed in to reconstruct Iraq.

8 posted on 04/04/2003 10:38:42 PM PST by Kay Soze (For every 100 Osamas created in the fight on terrorism - we shall elect one more "W")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson