To: Jhoffa_
It's more complicated than that.
If say immigration or the military start scrutinizing Muslims more than others then the ACLU and CAIR will go running to the courts to claim that is unconstitutional.
Banning is obviously not going to fly, but where will the line be drawn.
I would assume that you are not now in favor of unfettered mulsim immigration into this country?
The scutiny is where the constitutional battle will be fault.
276 posted on
04/05/2003 6:21:22 PM PST by
wardaddy
(G-d speed our fighters!)
To: wardaddy
I would assume that you are not now in favor of unfettered mulsim immigration into this country?
My position on immigration is that it should be to our benefit. As opposed to being some weird type of "aid" package we hand out willy, nilly.
It doesn't matter to me how "CAIR" feels about it. These people aren't citizens and we owe them nothing, imo.
278 posted on
04/05/2003 6:25:41 PM PST by
Jhoffa_
(Frodo sleeps with men...)
To: wardaddy
Good Lord...fault=fought....
281 posted on
04/05/2003 6:30:19 PM PST by
wardaddy
(G-d speed our fighters!)
To: wardaddy
bttt
282 posted on
04/05/2003 6:32:38 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(there is one God and it is not Allah.......there is one SATAN and it is ALLAH......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson