To: FreedomCalls
You obviously aren't addressing this to me, because I hate terrorists.
Further, if you will re-read the thread you will see that post #5 is what brought me and my (obviously) unwelcome opinion into the matter to begin with.
It regards domestic Muslims and a "ban" on them in toto.
Aside from that, kill all the terrorists you want. I will cheer you on.
122 posted on
04/04/2003 7:32:31 PM PST by
Jhoffa_
(Frodo sleeps with men...)
To: Jhoffa_
There's a difference between recognizing that all Muslims aren't terrorists and being naive.
The facts are aligned against the "peaceful" nature of Islam. If someone can cite me similar verses in Buddhists texts, we can talk. Even Jesus "I came not to bring peace but a sword" is tame in comparison to the Koran.
Let me know when you hear Buddhist clerics all over the world calling for jihad.
128 posted on
04/04/2003 7:39:49 PM PST by
Skywalk
To: Jhoffa_
...me and my (obviously) unwelcome opinion Don't confuse debate with welcomeness. You're very welcome. Free Republic would be a dry and dusty place if we didn't have differences of opinion. I don't want to argue with myself ;-) though I have replied to my own post more than once. Debating peripheral points serves to clarify the main point sometimes. Heck, check out DU, where you can't even get people to all agree on the basic fundamentals of anything. I am always encouraged by the high level of discourse here on FR. It's very addictive.
130 posted on
04/04/2003 7:42:07 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Jhoffa_
Aside from that, kill all the terrorists you want. I will cheer you on. Will you also cheer on the killing of terrorist accomplices?
414 posted on
04/07/2003 9:59:58 PM PDT by
Dec31,1999
(Freedom is not free, but rather, must be paid for.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson