Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The LA Weekly is a giveaway "alternative" tabloid that usually leans left, but this guy's media analysis is excellent. The only thing I have any reservations about is that he knocks John F. Burns for his phone-ins to Charlie Rose. While Charlie is indeed a PBS airhead, Burns is a terrific reporter in spite of the fact that he works for the New York Times.
1 posted on 04/04/2003 4:09:39 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TheMole
Yeah, this is a good one, Mole. Thanks for the post.
2 posted on 04/04/2003 4:13:50 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
Believe me the L.A. Weekly does NOT get it. It is one of most anti-america, anti-Bush rags in the area. This is temporary insanity on their part.
3 posted on 04/04/2003 4:17:34 PM PST by John Lenin (Women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
Wow! With this and Marc Cooper going after the anti-war crowd last week, I wonder if I'm reading the same LA Weekly I know and .. um ... don't really love :-).

Mark Steyn said it better, and a week ago, but it's nice to see people get a clue who I really expected to stay far, far away from one.

D

4 posted on 04/04/2003 4:21:54 PM PST by daviddennis (Visit amazing.com for protest accounts, video & more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
John Burns’ nightly telephone chat from Baghdad on Charlie Rose. ...sends such a sense of foreboding down the line it’s enough to make you want to blow your brains out before you go to bed. ...the “worst-case scenario” seems to be the only game in town

I caught it last night and actually did feel so rotten I had to pull the covers over my head. Charlie Rose will go to any length to blast Bush. His interview with Friedman got out of hand when Friedman enthusiastically expressed the opinion that we had to go into Iraq now. Rose slammed the table and yelled that Bush's plan basically sucked, and Friedman caught the hint and "of course" blasted Bush too.

Many liberal journalists are forced to agree that the war is working out fine now, but they still get in their digs at the president.

6 posted on 04/04/2003 4:31:45 PM PST by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
"General Wesley Clark looks on, secretly wishing he could court-martial the guy and knock some sense into the entire lily-livered news corps. "

Little "Sidekick" Wesley- Aaron's thumbsucking puppet? LOL!

A hard-core lefty wrote this.

8 posted on 04/04/2003 4:44:19 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
Perhaps it will inspire the Arabs to do something about their own governments for a change, and to stop whining about everyone else’s. Come to think of it, maybe the Europeans could take the hint, too.

Perfect exit line -- I love it!

9 posted on 04/04/2003 4:58:17 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
I agree that Burns is a terrific reporter. Let's say, he is very un-New York Time-ly.
10 posted on 04/04/2003 6:33:38 PM PST by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole
Very entertaining.
11 posted on 04/04/2003 6:44:25 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson