Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel
This is a "free" nation that was based upon Christian principles.

Within that document it clearly states that government cannot establish a religion.

For "lawmaker" to think that they have the power to tell a "free" person how to pray, no matter what religion the "lawmaker" is then something has gotten turned upside down.

There is no way that the opposite situation could occur and there not be the hue and cry of anti-semitism.

Somebody in that legislature has gotten a bit to brazen to think that as a lawmaker they can tell anyone what is an acceptable prayer. It is far worse than "censorship" for any lawmaker to tell someone how and what is acceptable in a prayer.

Would you stand for someone, anyone telling you who to and how to pray? I think not.
23 posted on 04/04/2003 9:03:14 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
E-CU-MEN-I-CAL.

If I asked someone to offer an ecumenical invocation, and they refused to do so, then I don't think it amounts to "telling them how to pray" to decline to invite them to offer the invocation.
26 posted on 04/05/2003 7:09:26 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson