Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Mason Is Navy's Newest Destroyer Destroyer To Sail Into Port Canaveral
www.local6.com ^ | Posted: 5:40 a.m. EST April 3, 2003 | www.local6.com

Posted on 04/04/2003 8:44:14 AM PST by Tank-FL

The USS Mason, the Navy's newest ship, will cruise into port past Jetty Park in what will likely be the public's best opportunity to see the vessel, according to WKMG News partner Florida Today.

** More than 4,000 people have been invited to the ceremony, among them legislative and civic leaders. The private event will be held April 12 at the Navy's Trident Pier at Port Canaveral, across the channel from Jetty Park. It is not open to the public.


TOPICS: Announcements; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: destroyer; navyussmason; shipmovement; usn; ussmason
I wish I had a ticket to this event..
1 posted on 04/04/2003 8:44:14 AM PST by Tank-FL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL
As in Jackie Mason?
2 posted on 04/04/2003 8:48:24 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL
I'm guessing this vessel is doubly destructive.
3 posted on 04/04/2003 8:54:03 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL

4 posted on 04/04/2003 8:57:11 AM PST by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL
Shot from foc'sle:


5 posted on 04/04/2003 8:58:23 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL
A destroyer destroyer? This will no doubt lead to a furthering of the arms race as the enemy develops a destroyer destroyer destroyer.
6 posted on 04/04/2003 9:06:44 AM PST by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Haze grey & underway.
7 posted on 04/04/2003 9:36:36 AM PST by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PMCarey
I gues you can't have two line titles?
8 posted on 04/04/2003 9:58:27 AM PST by Tank-FL (Keep the Faith - GO VMI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: billorites
A fine, distinguished and appropriate name.

See: http://www.mason.navy.mil/
9 posted on 04/04/2003 9:58:30 AM PST by namsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL
Nice ship. The Arleigh Burke Flight IIA's are practically Tico VLS cruisers.
However, I'm concerned that they lack the Phalanx CIWS system.
10 posted on 04/04/2003 10:16:58 AM PST by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice; Tank-FL
That's a little too brand new for my tastes.
It still has that 'packing crate' look to it, and the 'new ship' smell.
That, and the first crew is going to cry really hard when they get transferred off to another ship...
Plankowners and all that...
11 posted on 04/04/2003 1:24:12 PM PST by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
It looks like gear adrift in that picture.
12 posted on 04/04/2003 4:09:21 PM PST by battlegearboat (Tag line is closed for cleaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
Looks like she was near completion, or newly completed and they hadn't yet cleared the decks of tackle.
I do have to admit, Arleigh Burkes are fine looking ships...
13 posted on 04/04/2003 4:27:08 PM PST by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Too bad they cost so much.
14 posted on 04/04/2003 5:32:02 PM PST by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
*Wide eyes, nodding affirmatively*
Yeah.
That they do.
15 posted on 04/04/2003 5:34:33 PM PST by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
It seems to me that we might want to have a mix of ships including a slightly less capable (but cheaper) F100
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/nansen.htm
Or build a replacement for the OH Perry class with land attack capabilities.
16 posted on 04/04/2003 7:02:38 PM PST by rmlew ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
That would be smart.
But..
Our frigates are in need of upgrading, as well as some replacement (OHP class. As you mentioned.)
And we do need a cruiser replacement for the Ticonderogas.
They're getting up there in years.
As are the Spruance DD's.

But, the Clinton controlled congress killed all development.
As did every Democrat controlled congress before them.
It was lucky that the SSN21 class boats got built, as well as the Arleigh Burkes.
17 posted on 04/05/2003 7:25:52 AM PST by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tank-FL
Go Navy!
18 posted on 04/05/2003 10:42:50 AM PST by LibKill (Nuke Berlin! Better late than never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson