[xm177e2]

Note: The only topics I subscribed this thread to are "FR" and "Vanity" ("Your Opinion/Questions"). If any others are here, they were added by someone else.

[Illbay]

Not to mention those who have figured out that they can get their stupid vanity posts at the top of the sidebar list by posting them in "Activism."

[cynicom]

You have too much time on your hands.

[Illbay]

Oh, and be advised that you're going to get flamed big-time by the "children" on FR that think rules don't apply to them.

[petuniasevan]

PLUS:

Right now, the only threads which are supposed to be posted to Breaking News are war-related breaking stories.

This comes from Jim himself.

Announcement Regarding the Breaking News Posting Category

This and other important issues are referenced in this thread:

Way Too Many Vanities (Updated)

[thinktwice]

Anthrax and WoT should be pretty easy to figure out.

I'll bite; what's a "WoT"?

[woofie]

Topic abuse is a serious problem and must be stopped ...file this under spatulas

[BradyLS]

I have to agree. FR these days is 50% vanity and 40% argument. Still, the remaining 10% keeps me coming back.

[Fury]

Topic abuse? As in topical abuse?

What about subcuteanous abuse?

Intramusculer abuse?

A loading dose of abuse?

[yooper]

What category is this post?

[antaresequity]

And your irritated because of?

[dennisw]

I NEVER look at topics. I just look at the 50 latest posts which is what 95% of Freepers do. I don't "subscribe" to jack.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Can someone add topics to any thread? I always thought only the original threads poster could.

R U an admin moderator that came out as xm, or just wanted to vent?

[mc10]

you just had to "share" this with us didn't you? Why don't you just not go to philosophy if you don't approve.

[mc10]

you just had to "share" this with us didn't you? Why don't you just not go to philosophy if you don't approve.

[Billthedrill]

Why did you post this in the "Kinky Interspecies Sex" topic area? That's the only one I'm subscribed to.

[Fury]

Take a look at the articles with the topic "Philosophy"--less than half of these articles can reasonably be described as relating to philosophy.

This could explain the "C" I received in Intro to Philosophy.

[jackbill]

"Soldier Is Relieved for Streaking on Base" or news of a dozen different bomb attacks--those are not philosophical threads!

Obviously the "streaking" soldier has a philosophy. Just because it doesn't match yours does that mean that his is meaningless, or irrelevant?

I think that you need to reassess your own "philosophy". Perhaps you are a bit intolerant. Perhaps you are a bit more than intolerant. Perhaps you are a philosophobe.

[Revolting cat!]

"I yam spud!"

[notyourregularhandle]

Wow, Jim and the Admins must be busy. Thanks for helping out... ???

[Republic of Texas]

I know why you started this thread, and it's a noble cause. But I'd rather discuss the upcoming baseball season, or Civil War history.

Announcer cutting in..."Yes topic abuse is a very bad thing, but let's not forget, THREAD ABUSE. Can we just TRY to stay on topic? It's for the chil'ren.