Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: konaice
This war is not an adequate test for the M-1. Or the M-2 for that matter. We would really find out about them in a conflict against N. Korea or China. The true test is a battlefield where air superiority is not assured.

One lesson we did learn from tank warfare, was in WWII. He that has the MOST NUMEROUS tanks, with the best tactics, can overwhelm an enemy with the BEST tanks.

53 posted on 04/03/2003 6:25:42 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Republic of Texas
The true test is a battlefield where air superiority is not assured.

While that may be true in a strict test of "tank" capability, the tank is evolving into a network of interconnected and intercommunicating vehicles known as a "combat system," which should be truly integrated on the battlefield. So while it may, at some point, have to survive "on its own as a single platform," that is not the design vision, nor the system's intended strength. It is intended to be most lethal and survivable as an element of a larger network of interoperating platforms, which include airborne and land-based platforms of all types.

If you watch Star Trek, think "Borg."

69 posted on 04/03/2003 7:48:05 PM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson