I thought you lot deserved a good laugh. ;)
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
04/03/2003 2:04:15 PM PST by
MadIvan
To: patricia; annyokie; Citizen of the Savage Nation; cgk; proust; swheats; starfish; maui_hawaii; ...
Bump!
2 posted on
04/03/2003 2:04:32 PM PST by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
OK.
But(t) I want it back. <|:)~
3 posted on
04/03/2003 2:08:14 PM PST by
martin_fierro
(Mr. Avuncular)
To: MadIvan
Homosexuals are obsessed with proving that anyone who is anyone is or was a fairy.
I once read a "serious" treatise describing the obviously homosexual relationship between David of the Bible, and Jonathan the son of King Saul.
4 posted on
04/03/2003 2:09:39 PM PST by
Illbay
(Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
To: MadIvan
Yes, but how does this square with the Baconian Heresy?
9 posted on
04/03/2003 2:57:43 PM PST by
demosthenes the elder
(scum will never cease to be scum - why must that be explained to anyone?)
To: MadIvan
I hate to agree with Ian McKellan about anything, but the truth is that if you read the sonnets it seems pretty clear that Shakespeare was probably bi, and to think so you don't have to be either (a) gay or (b) an overeducated academic. There is an awful lot of unmistakeable stuff in the sonnets about his "lovely boy" and their passion. It's possible to make up all sorts of things to explain this away, but the language is so straightforward that the simplest explanation is probably the best. It seems that the sonnets were private poem-missives to a young man Shakespeare was carrying on with but who was being encouraged to marry for dynastic reasons. Despite the glorious heights of beauty the language of the sonnets attains, the meaning is fairly creepy.
12 posted on
04/03/2003 3:06:27 PM PST by
Capriole
(Foi vainquera)
To: MadIvan
"He's gay, Jim."
16 posted on
04/03/2003 3:58:32 PM PST by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: MadIvan
The premise that Shakespeare was gay is hilarious. What the author does with it is even funnier. The author left out Jonathan, King David's friend. David's comment that Johnathan's love was better than that of women has been taken by some gay apologists as meaning that David was openly gay at a time when openly gay men were stoned to death; I guess they made an exception for him...Of course, today is the age when people spend more effort trying to rewrite the Bible than studying it...
"For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear." 2 Timothy 4:3
24 posted on
04/03/2003 5:47:37 PM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(What part of "We're winning" did you not understand?)
To: MadIvan
Libs would claim that God Himself is gay, or at least bisexual. Every day that passes, God abandons them more and more to their reprobate minds.
27 posted on
04/03/2003 9:35:35 PM PST by
laz17
(Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson