To: JohnHuang2
Seems to me also that if she had actually shot Iraqi soldiers, she'd not be alive today. History indicates that soldiers in contact don't take prisoners. Had she shot several Iraqis, no way would they not kill her in the heat of battle. And why leave her as a witness if they did execute several of our people?
There's a lot more to come out on this story.
Walt
10 posted on
04/03/2003 1:28:25 PM PST by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
To: WhiskeyPapa
I have to agree. I'd much rather hear her story directly from her when the dust settles.
17 posted on
04/03/2003 1:31:41 PM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: WhiskeyPapa
They have special uses for pretty blonde, blue-eyed young women. I doubt it's a coincidence that she's the only (confirmed) survivor of this attack.
To: WhiskeyPapa
This may be the greatest advance in US military history since Sherman sliced through Georgia.
To: WhiskeyPapa
I'm thinking they should have waited to debrief her. There were other females here, and either one of them could have shot up the Iraqis. They aren't here to tell the tale.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson