[Diddley]

Mailman told the New York Post that she thought Bollinger "handled it very beautifully when he certainly disavowed, personally, for the university and for himself, all of the professor's comment, but upholds his right to make them."

Mr. Bollinger:
YOU have the right of free speech also.
You CAN say that such statements (although "protected") undermine the United States.
You CAN say that De Genova should be called to acount for his remarks by the public.
You CAN say that - although De Genova has the right to speak - he can morally be held to pay for his statements.
YOU, Mr. Bollinger, HAVE the right to free speech also.
You CAN make the the above statements and similar ones.
It would be a good-faith example of how YOU exercise YOUR free-speech. Will You do it?

Or, you CAN say that you don't care if allumni withold funds, you will not condemn De Genova.

[cebadams]

Mr. Bollinger:
YOU have the right of free speech also.
You CAN say that such statements (although "protected") undermine the United States.
You CAN say that De Genova should be called to acount for his remarks by the public.
You CAN say that - although De Genova has the right to speak - he can morally be held to pay for his statements.
YOU, Mr. Bollinger, HAVE the right to free speech also.
You CAN make the the above statements and similar ones.
It would be a good-faith example of how YOU exercise YOUR free-speech. Will You do it?

Or, you CAN say that you don't care if allumni withold funds, you will not condemn De Genova.

Ahhh Mr. Bollinger. First you implement an Affirmative Action policy at the University of Michigan that winds up in front of the Supreme Court and now you defend statements made by this guy. geesh!