To: tdadams
The other day I was filling out some insurance paperwork on a 40 year old female client (overweight, divorced with a 13 year old daughter) of mine. The question of beneficiary came up and she listed her husband. Birthdate: 1977. I kind of chucked to myself as I did the mental calculation and thought, "poor kid." Yep, sometimes they like 'em young, but afterall, women statistically outlive men.
17 posted on
04/03/2003 6:03:25 AM PST by
Xthe17th
(FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
To: Xthe17th
14 is too young to marry in today's society, but that wasn't always so. History is full of tales, few recent, of boys that age doing the work of men. A 14-year-old wasn't always the spoiled, materialistic overgrown infant we see around us so much. Dave Barry's most recent column reminds me that there was a time when mid-teenagers could be trusted without direct adult supervision.
I also know a woman married to a man 20 years younger than she is. They sure got a lot of flack when they married...20 happy years ago. They're good for each other. Of course, he was in his 20s, not his teens, when they married. THAT makes a huge difference.
I suspect these parents have found a way to have someone else support their kid. Sad. But they're legal now.
23 posted on
04/03/2003 7:08:01 AM PST by
ChemistCat
(My new bumper sticker: MY OTHER DRIVER IS A ROCKET SCIENTIST)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson