I've read this whole thread, and you two seem to be the only ones making sensible arguments based on the article. The rest either have a real problem with basic reading comprehension, or know they have nothing to rebut you with, so they resort to
ad hominem attacks.
Of course, there are those who manage to combine both, such as asking such idiotic questions as: "...are you accusing serving officers in the US Army of lying about this event?"
You two have made this thread an interesting read.