Replies

Women on the battlefield put the lives of our fighting men at needless additional risk... So what are the lives of a few men compared to that? There is no price too high for the feminist's agenda.

Our weak military is losing many lives of men and failing to perform in this war? - Are you watching a different war than I am? I think their advances and extremely low losses show a force that is the best in the world, in spite of these women being there.

Your fear was real, however, it is not playing out. Our military is strong.

"Our weak military is losing many lives of men and failing to perform in this war? - Are you watching a different war than I am? I think their advances and extremely low losses show a force that is the best in the world, in spite of these women being there.

Your fear was real, however, it is not playing out. Our military is strong."

Indeed they are. So why are women there? To prove a feminist point that women are equal to men? They are not needed to win the war, and place our brave fighting men at needless additional risks. So to your mind, how much additional risks must our brave fighting men take to indulge your political correctness and feminism?

Women on the battlefield serve only to promote and further a feminist and politically correct agenda, at the risk of the lives of our brave men. But then, so many have already died on the alter of feminism already. I suppose a few good man added to that list is of no consequence.

It is interesting how we at FR loath Liberalism, but then embrace feminism. We are, and will continue to be, victims of our own duplicity.