So, you're not put off by him or his faith in the least. Good. I should not have been so sweeping in my use of the word 'none', I suppose. My apologies.
But you kinda prove my point, too.
As to you thinking I sound a bit arrogant? I'm sorry to hear that. I'm just stating my opinion.
I agree with you EV. I read the article and thought it was pretty reasonable. The only thing that made me cringe was the quote from Evans about a mandate from God. I'm fairly religious but I don't care for that kind of talk or thinking from a president. However, Bush has always said that he believes things happen for a reason so I prefer to think of it that way rather than a mandate from God. Other than that, though, I found the article to be pretty positive and what I would expect from the CIC in times of war.
He's got the weight of the world on his shoulders so of course he is going to show signs of strain. If this means he jokes less than usual, so be it. He is obviously a man who is aware of the gravity of the situation and he is ultimately the one who is responsible for the troops. He sent them into battle, he's bound to worry about them. I'm grateful that he is interested in the war progress and the fate of our troops.
I don't think there is much in here about legacy building, per se. The article mentions the fact that there is no stenographer, nothing is taped, etc. Doesn't sound to me like a man obsessed with legacy building.
All in all my impression is of a man with an incredibly difficult job who is managing it and handling it. God bless him.