Skip to comments.
U.S. demands unconditional surrender
Washington Times ^
| 4/02/03
| Bill Gertz
Posted on 04/01/2003 11:18:05 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:02:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld yesterday demanded the "unconditional surrender" of Saddam Hussein as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff called criticism of the U.S. war plan in Iraq "bogus."
"The only thing that the coalition will discuss with this regime is their unconditional surrender," Mr. Rumsfeld told reporters at the Pentagon.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billgertz; ceasefire; iraq; iraqifreedom; peacetalks; rumsfeld; surrender; surrenderterms
1
posted on
04/01/2003 11:18:06 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Unconditional surrender? How can that be? How can the side that's losing the war demand unconditional surrender? Hasn't Rummy been listening to the NY times, the LA Times, the Washington Post, and Peter Arnett, all of whom have revealed that the Iraqis are kicking our butts? Boy, Rummy sure is out of touch.
2
posted on
04/01/2003 11:39:23 PM PST
by
laz17
(Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
To: kattracks
I think that the Iraqi's might be willing to go along with with an Unconditional surrender as long as we let them call it "A Glorious Victory" in Arabic.
3
posted on
04/03/2003 6:24:43 PM PST
by
UnChained
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson