Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Republican Guard's last stand
UPI ^ | 4/1/03 | Martin Walker

Posted on 04/01/2003 9:40:01 AM PST by browardchad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: browardchad; hchutch
What do Saddam Hussein and George Armstrong Custer have in common?

Neither one had any idea where the fatal Tomahawk came from :o)
21 posted on 04/01/2003 10:16:42 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
If they try to counter attack it's going to be like Pickett's Charge at Gettysburg. Knee deep in blood.

Hair, teeth, and eyeballs
22 posted on 04/01/2003 10:16:58 AM PST by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of American anger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
The RG vehicles don't have rear-view mirrors.

Good thing, eh?

23 posted on 04/01/2003 10:17:26 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
My favorite Major Bobism was that the "operational pause" was like a butcher sharpening his knife before starting work. Even the Fox crew got quiet.

I heard it too and had to grin.

Let's start the chant: MOAB-MOAB-MOAB-MOAB-MOAB...

24 posted on 04/01/2003 10:18:17 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
They left out "Elite" from the title.

I think the Republican Guard's stock has just been downgraded from "elite" to "endangered."

25 posted on 04/01/2003 10:19:57 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
So far, all the maps I have seen on television and online, show the 82nd Airborne still largely in Kuwait. What if they are secretly in the Western Desert of Iraq, and will be part of the northern force that will come down and drive through the weakened Iraqi defenses, to take Baghdad while the bulk of the RG divisions have deployed to the south, in repsonse to the 101, and the Marines? This may be another "Hail Mary" kind of operation, that we will only fully perceive after the fact?
26 posted on 04/01/2003 10:20:58 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
"If they try to counter attack it's going to be like Pickett's Charge at Gettysburg. Knee deep in blood."

Or even worse ... Fredericksburg ...
Or Franklin/Nashville.

27 posted on 04/01/2003 10:21:15 AM PST by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: aegiscg47
But what else can they do if their present forces in the south are inadequate? It's Hobson's choice.
28 posted on 04/01/2003 10:21:58 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Man, they are doing things for us. GOOD!
29 posted on 04/01/2003 10:22:27 AM PST by madison46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
What if they are secretly in the Western Desert of Iraq, and will be part of the northern force that will come down and drive through the weakened Iraqi defenses

Quite a few people on FR think there's something in the Western desert of Iraq -- time will tell.

30 posted on 04/01/2003 10:24:04 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aegiscg47
"Replacing wiped out units with units from the North of the city only to have them destroyed in turn is great strategy. Haven't seen this kind of military genius since France in 1940"

Speaking of which, France's 6 million strong army (800,000 of them were on leave when Hitler attacked) managed to lose their entire country from the first day of the German invasion (May 10, 1940) to June 20, 1940.

Which brings up the obvious question: will Hussein last longer against 100,000 U.S./UK troops than France's 6 million versus the 102 Wehrmacht divisions of 1940?

31 posted on 04/01/2003 10:26:14 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
A good read.
32 posted on 04/01/2003 10:26:34 AM PST by ChadGore (288,007,154 Americans did not protest the war today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
"...Red Zone around Baghdad, where local commanders may have authority to use chemical weapons..."

Seems like we should be making it clear that any Iraqi unit using chemical weapons WILL NOT BE PERMITTED to surrender!

That might give the occasional rational person something to think about...

33 posted on 04/01/2003 10:30:59 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
"The settlers get to shoot from behind the rocks and trees, and wear any color they want. The British have to wear red, and march in a stright line."
34 posted on 04/01/2003 10:32:11 AM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
Methinks we have a few aces up our sleeves. We MUST, MUST, MUST not allow this to become a battle in the streets of Baghdad. We are going to do whatever necessary to avoid that. And let's have those 4,000 jihadi's from Syria, Lebanon, etc, join the RG in hell.
35 posted on 04/01/2003 10:33:12 AM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"You mean this 'elite' force won't last a week?

Who 'da thunkit?"

Ah, maybe that's "elite" with respect to the rest of the camel dung around there!

36 posted on 04/01/2003 10:33:31 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shotgun
"...our tanks also have and would rather use thermal imaging."

I'm guessing that a more important advantage is our computerized fire-control systems permitting our tanks to shoot "on the run" while a T-72 must stop to aim in order to have any chance at all of hitting its' target.

37 posted on 04/01/2003 10:35:51 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Seems like we should be making it clear that any Iraqi unit using chemical weapons WILL NOT BE PERMITTED to surrender!

I doubt that they'll have the opportunity.

38 posted on 04/01/2003 10:39:35 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
a sixth RG Division, the al-Adnan, is also reported moving south from Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit to join them.

I wonder how they are getting there, without being blasted from the air? Who knows, maybe they are being blasted.

39 posted on 04/01/2003 10:41:45 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo; aegiscg47
"How long can you tread water?"
40 posted on 04/01/2003 10:45:20 AM PST by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson