Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there a sucker punch coming from the North? [Complete Vanity]
Yours Truly | 3/31/2003 | Yours Truly

Posted on 03/31/2003 2:39:58 PM PST by TheConservator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Comments?
1 posted on 03/31/2003 2:39:58 PM PST by TheConservator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/879568/posts
2 posted on 03/31/2003 2:42:20 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Only one comment. I hope you are 100% correct.
3 posted on 03/31/2003 2:42:27 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
I've been saying it for days. Hope it comes true. I saw a report about what division was unloading up there and it was a very interesting number.
4 posted on 03/31/2003 2:42:42 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
I don't think speculation like this does anything more than fuel our vanity while ensuring our enemies consider every possibility.

That said, I've had the same thought. I don't believe we've seen "shock and awe" yet...
5 posted on 03/31/2003 2:44:22 PM PST by pgyanke (Please, Lord, prevent unnecessary casualties in this conflict...and maximize the necessary ones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
That number isn't "1" is it?
6 posted on 03/31/2003 2:44:37 PM PST by TruBluKentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Well, if it's not happening, it certainly seems like an opportunity. Any force that entered between Baghdad and Tikrit would find a soft underbelly.
7 posted on 03/31/2003 2:44:44 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
A shrewd fighter doesn't telegraph his punches.
8 posted on 03/31/2003 2:44:52 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
I have found it interesting that the news coming out from western Iraq has been noticeably absent. If we took those airfields in the first few days, it would make sense to start using them to bring in a lot of men and equipment. Just speculation though.
9 posted on 03/31/2003 2:45:15 PM PST by Rammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
I agree with your analysis. We've got a huge edge in maneuverability and it makes all the sense in the world to attack from a surprise direction--perhaps to cut off the RG from behind.

Lots of the stuff coming out as Pentaon "leaks" are likely disinformation for the purposes of fooling the Iraqis.

12 years ago the "left hook" was pretty obvious given the way the forces were arrayed, so I would suspect we've got something up our sleeves again.

The best part is that even if the Iraqis expect it, they can't really move forces to meet the attack without attracting a lot of attention from our air power.
10 posted on 03/31/2003 2:45:31 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
11 posted on 03/31/2003 2:45:44 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Maybe our forces in the north will stay back from Baghdad. This will give the RG the impression that there is a northern escape route and then they will kill them as they try to escape. It might sucker the RG into attempting to flee Baghdad instead of going into it to fight.
12 posted on 03/31/2003 2:45:48 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Pretty much what I've been hinting at here and there. Our war plans would be...lacking...if they didn't involve something resembling deception on a mass scale. We never do hear about anything going on in H1, H2, and H3, and that Post 160 was bombed on opening night, almost 2 weeks ago. Similarly, we don't hear too much about the north that doesn't involve the Kurds.

With the recent news that some RG units based in the north have migrated south, they are just starting to get ripe for such a suckerpunch.

13 posted on 03/31/2003 2:45:52 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Hey, we now have six new airbases in the Middle East, there are a host of possiblities this presents which "encourages" certain nations to think twice.
14 posted on 03/31/2003 2:47:25 PM PST by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
You're probably correct that something's going down. My personal opinion is that they're trying to draw units down from Tikrit, and we'd hit them there. Not only is that Saddam's home town, but one of the briefings (Pentagon or CENTCOMM) noted that that's also where they think the main WMD stores are.

Thing is, the Iraqis pretty much have no choice but to send troops down to Baghdad, even if they do suspect a strike at Tikrit.

If they don't shift troops, then we destroy the RG around Baghdad, besiege the city, and move on up to Tikrit and destroy the RG there.

And if they do shift troops -- hoping to delay us around Baghdad -- then our backdoor play works even better.

15 posted on 03/31/2003 2:50:03 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
I would be really impressed if our whole dispute with Turkey turned out to be an enormous deception, and we were smuggling our troops into northern Iraq through there anyway (with the full cooperation of the Turks). Sort of the reverse of Patton's "phantom army" before D-Day. I don't really believe this could happen, but it would be something.
16 posted on 03/31/2003 2:50:09 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Well, a northern front was always part of the plan...
17 posted on 03/31/2003 2:50:15 PM PST by pgyanke (Please, Lord, prevent unnecessary casualties in this conflict...and maximize the necessary ones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Comments?

Yes, one.

Vanity = Chat.

18 posted on 03/31/2003 2:50:48 PM PST by Neets (Mess with me and you'll be introduced to my big ole can of MOAB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
There seem to be none, .......zero......zip....nada....reporters embedded with the II MEF and there has been no report out there about there whereabouts. IN addition, do you think all this 4 day pause, strung out supply lines and other stuff might have been Pentagon disinformation?

My guess is the top Iraqi generals have been without Saddam since March 27th, wehn a big bunker buster went off and they have no idea whether to $hit or wind their wrist watch. Rumors are circulating that families of the big shots are fleeing Baghdad.... That happened to the Nazis near the end. He's dead Jim.

19 posted on 03/31/2003 2:51:21 PM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
The coalition captured the H2 and H3 airfields in western Iraq on the first day of the war.

For all we know, the U.S. could have been landing transport planes up there ever since. Thus there may be even more materials and troops up there than you think. Good analysis.

20 posted on 03/31/2003 2:52:01 PM PST by SamAdams76 (California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson