Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Is this a tirade against "anything and everything American"? Far from it. First, I hasten to remind you that "American" refers to all of the Americas, not merely to the United States, as U.S. imperial chauvinism would have it. More importantly, my rejection of U.S. nationalism is an appeal to liberate our own political imaginations such that we might usher in a radically different world in which we will not remain the prisoners of U.S. global domination.

Looks like a tirade against all things American to me. He wants a revolution. The only thing he appears to want from the old America is its land and resources and the radical 10 percent he seeks to lead.
7 posted on 03/31/2003 12:11:58 PM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FreeTheHostages
Well, technically the traitorous professor is right.

Martin Waldseemüller was the man who named AMERICA.

He named it after the Florence Italy native, Amerigo Vespucci who had written about his travels to the new world. Martin printed a wood block map with his own invention of a name "AMERICA" across what is now called South America. (See Amerigo Vespucci, about.com).

However it is common, historically-established since people had names, and all-in-all quite proper to call the biggest and most influential member of a set of things by the name of that set. In this case, "America" is a perfectfectly fine alternate way of naming the "United States of America".

92 posted on 03/31/2003 12:46:01 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson