Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Are Army Divisions Numbered?
MSN, explainer Answers to your questions about the news. ^ | march-29-2003 | By Phillip Carter

Posted on 03/31/2003 10:23:13 AM PST by green team 1999

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: ZULU
and a squad equals a mess of Roman legionnaires.

A maniple.

61 posted on 03/31/2003 1:35:55 PM PST by Junior (Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
...which reminds me of the mnemonic we learned at Air Force basic training: "How many new airmen will get sore feet". That is how we remembered the hierarchal break down of Air Force units, which is as follows:
Headquarters AF
Major Command
Numbered Air Force
Air Division
Wing
Group
Squadron
Flight
62 posted on 03/31/2003 1:51:11 PM PST by TankerKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Thanks for the reply. So here is a not-too-closely related question:

Are the modern combat elements (squad, platoon, company, battalion, brigade, division, corp, army..did I miss any?) a product of modern (since rifles, anyway) weaponry, or are they the result of how many people can be dedicated to a specific task or set of tasks, and therefore a product of the nature of leadership and command decision methods that go back however far in history?

I realize that is a run-on question, but I just wonder what the rationale is behind the structure.
63 posted on 03/31/2003 1:51:24 PM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi
You're asking a Navy guy this? Our idea of a division is a grouping of workcenters, with several divisions falling under a department.

However, I think formal platoons are a fairly recent invention, dating back only to the First World War. Before that, the company was the basic maneuver element. There were usually a dozen or so companies in a regiment. Battalions were formed ad hoc for specific operations in the 19th century, but the basic units were the regiment and company.

You must remember, prior to the 20th century, available weapons required maneuver elements to be larger to be effective. As weaponry became more effective, the basic maneuver element got smaller, both because it was more effective and because smaller elements made smaller targets. Also, over time, ad hoc elements became more formalized and eventually became permanent parts of the order of battle.

64 posted on 03/31/2003 2:06:54 PM PST by Junior (Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi
"I realize that is a run-on question, but I just wonder what the rationale is behind the structure."

The rationale is that a commander can only handle a maximum of four to five items under the pressure of combat. Thus a fire team leader manages three or four men. A squad leader manages two fire teams plus his comm guy. A platoon leader handles three or four squads. And so on up the line.

Another factor is two up (engaged), one back (reserve), one support unit.
65 posted on 03/31/2003 2:35:09 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
Thanks for the info. So it seems that literal size is determined by the weaponry and tactics, and logical relationship of elements is determined by cereberal limits of average commanders.

66 posted on 03/31/2003 2:37:45 PM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
Bump
67 posted on 03/31/2003 2:39:23 PM PST by Kay Soze (France is a terrorist nation - "The country where the worms live above ground")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
My understanding is that a 1st Lt commands a Platoon

To be technical, a Lt. "leads" a platoon. He doesn't "command" it. "Command" doesn't start until you reach company size.

a Captain commands the Company,a Lt Col commands the Battalion, a full Col commands the Regiment, and a two-star commands the Division.

All true.

I guess a three-star commands an Army?

Nope. A three star commands a Corps, which consists of 2+ divisions.

What does a 2nd Lt command?

A 2ndLt. can lead a platoon -- doesn't have to be a First Lt.

Or a Major??

Generally, majors are staff officers on the Battalion Commander's staff. A major may command some special units such as reconnaissance companies, etc. And of course, there's no rule saying a senior major won't command a battalion for a bit while awaiting promotion.

68 posted on 03/31/2003 2:46:14 PM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi
"So it seems that literal size is determined by the weaponry and tactics, and logical relationship of elements is determined by cereberal limits of average commanders."

Yep. Kind of comforting. These guys actually *know* what they are doing.
69 posted on 03/31/2003 3:34:02 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
(i.e., a Captain in the Army isn't the same as a Captain in the Navy).

When I was in the Navy, stationed at an Air Force base, working at an all-services radio-TV detachment, one of the AF engineers took a phone call from an irate captain complaining about the weak TV signal. The sergeant got testy and told the the captain that the signal would be fixed when he could see clearer reception on his TV, and he angrily hung up the phone. The rest of us at the stationed giggled and asked him who he was yelling at. He said some captain at Yokosuka (a Navy base in Japan). The rest of us stood there with our mouths agape and explained to the AF guy that a captain in the Navy is an 0-6, one rank below admiral, not an 0-3 captain like the other services, a junior officer. Luckily, the guy never called back.

70 posted on 03/31/2003 3:49:58 PM PST by rabidralph (Very Soon, All Your Base Are Belong To Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I was an E-3 in the Navy when one of my civilian friends
jokingly addressed a letter to me as Admiral Cruse.
I got the letter okay, but with a nasty from the Navy
telling me to advise my correspondents of my correct
address.  LOL
71 posted on 03/31/2003 5:43:05 PM PST by gcruse (If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999; BlueLancer; centurion316; jackbill; No Truce With Kings
"Today's Army has eight infantry divisions: the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th, along with the 10th, 25th, 82nd, and 101st.

" ... "Divisions have 10,000-to-15,000 soldiers divided in three-to-five combat regiments and a number of support units."

O.K. Here's a related question that confuses me. Eight divisions only adds up to 80000-120000 soldiers. On C-SPAN about a week ago they were showing a table that gave the year-to-year populations of the regular services. I noticed that the current number of regular Army was somewhere in the 400,000's. So what do the other 300000 soldiers that are not part of one of the listed divisions do?

72 posted on 03/31/2003 6:14:01 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
Thanks for the info. I was thinking about Patton and his 3rd Army, but then those were much different times.

Is it the case then that one-stars serve as XO's to division commanders or flunkies to higher up generals?

I'm also curious as to what rank the British Group Captain corresponds to.

73 posted on 03/31/2003 6:18:36 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
A phalanx was a Greek formation of several ranks of men armed with long lances (sarissa) and shields which moved ponderously forwards like an unstoppable iron porcupine, smashing everything in its path. Its disadvantage was the difficulty of manoevereing over rough territory or responding to a flank or rear attack. Alexander used it well with cavalry to cover the flanks and rear.

The phalanx was proved inferior to the Legion at the battle of Cynoscephalae where a Roman Army destroyed a phalanx force.
74 posted on 03/31/2003 6:56:39 PM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
O.K. Here's a related question that confuses me. Eight divisions only adds up to 80000-120000 soldiers. On C-SPAN about a week ago they were showing a table that gave the year-to-year populations of the regular services. I noticed that the current number of regular Army was somewhere in the 400,000's. So what do the other 300000 soldiers that are not part of one of the listed divisions do?

Support? Everything from the guys at the Tomb of the Unknown, to recruiters in you home town, to unattached artillery, engineers, graves registration, medical, training cadre, base bureaucrats, etc., etc.. And then there is the Pentagon.

I've seen numbers like 5 to 10 "support" troops for every combat soldier. It takes more than a village to field a fighting army.

75 posted on 03/31/2003 7:22:32 PM PST by jackbill (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
How are they numbered? Try 1 then 2 then 3 etc. When you get to the higher numbers, hold your hands over your head and count higher 11 , 12 etc
76 posted on 03/31/2003 7:29:53 PM PST by Henchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Is it the case then that one-stars serve as XO's to division commanders or flunkies to higher up generals?

Generally, yes. But those are only their "combat" billets. All officers also have non-combat assignments during their careers. That might include things like recruiting, working as an instructor at a school, attending school, working at a base as a staff officer, etc.

I'm also curious as to what rank the British Group Captain corresponds to.

I'm guessing colonel, but that's just a guess.

77 posted on 03/31/2003 7:42:26 PM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
How Are Army Divisions Numbered? If you are the US, your number is "1". And if you are fighting the US, your number is "up".
78 posted on 03/31/2003 7:44:12 PM PST by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
Some belong to independent regiments or brigades -- such as the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, the 197th Infantry Brigade, or the 173rd Airborne Regiment.

Others belong to artillery units -- typically battalions or brigades. While much artillery is attached to divisions, other units are part of corps or army formations. These independent units are added to divisions on an as-needed basis, to support operations. There are also a lot of aviation units -- both transport and attack -- typically brigades.

Similarly there are combat support units -- Air Defense Artillery (including Patriot units), Combat Engineers, Military Police, Chemical Warfare Units, etc., that operate independently of divisions. These are typically battalions or brigades.

There are also support units -- ordinance, maintenance, transportation -- that support and supply the combat and combat support units. These, too, are typically organized in battalions, or brigades.

There are also training units, like the Ft. Benning Infantry School, Ft. Sill Artillery School or Ft. Bliss Air Defence School, that have training cadres.

Finally there are the Really-REMF units of the Judge Advocate General's Corps, the Army History Units, and Admin warriors of Pentagon, where the basic element of command is a GSD (grey steel desk).

It adds up.
79 posted on 03/31/2003 8:06:15 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
BTTT
80 posted on 03/31/2003 9:42:41 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson