From time to time. I can have trouble reconciling two beliefs I hold strongly too. In this case its a belief in the freedom of the press and the belief in loyalty to our government. They can often be at odds with each other especially in times of war.
This Arnett thing clearly provided a "bright line" division for virtually everyone concerned but I need to see where the line really is and where it should be. So far by debating it and acting as somewhat of a devils advocate I can accept the issue that his giving the interview itself and not necessarily what he said was and should have been seen as crossing the line.
I also see that repeating our own doubts and concerns could be considered giving aid and comfort but on that point I am finding difficulty because in fact its true, many do have these concerns and these conmcerns are widely reported in advance of his interview.
i have also learned that treason requires intent to do us harm and I don't think Arnett meant to cause any damage to us but that is merely my gut.
Finally, I am somewhat shocked that most freepers seem so ready to jump on the band wagon of choosing against freedom of the press in such a knee jerk way just because it conforms with our beliefs especially when the suppresion of news supporting our posistions on other things is something we encounter too often.