Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Celtjew Libertarian
There was apparently nothing unusual about Molly Pitcher bring water to soldiers under fire, even before she took her husbands spot on the cannon, after he collapsed.

Well, the British in the 1770's weren't the Saddam Fedayeen.

They didn't commit the kind of atrocities these people are committing; in fact, they probably directed fire AWAY from Molly Pitcher,

85 posted on 03/29/2003 12:34:26 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
They didn't commit the kind of atrocities these people are committing; in fact, they probably directed fire AWAY from Molly Pitcher,

Doubtful that the British knew they she was there. I note that Margaret Corbin, another woman who took over at a cannon for her fallen husband, was wounded at the Battle of Fort Washington.

In any case, in 1720, the British would have hung pirates Mary Read and Anne Bonney, except they were pregnant. I doubt the British had any compunction about killing woman, who happened to be in combat.

Indeed, doing a little research just now, I found that a number of woman fought the British and were killed by them in the Wexford Rising of 1798.

Bracketing a willingness by the British to kill woman in 1720 and 1798, I doubt that they would have had any compunction against killing Molly Pitcher.

91 posted on 03/29/2003 12:57:49 AM PST by Celtjew Libertarian (No more will we pretend that our desire/For liberty is number-cold and has no fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson