Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syria toughens pro-Saddam stance
The Age ^ | March 29 2003

Posted on 03/28/2003 4:39:32 PM PST by Rams82

Syria and the United States traded harsh words today, as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said he hoped the US would fail to depose Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld accused Syria of sending military supplies to Iraq.

In an interview published in the Lebanese daily As-Safir, Assad also predicted that, if the United States and Britain were to take over Iraq, they would be confronted by a "popular resistance" that would prevent them from controlling the country.

Syria, the only Arab member of the UN Security Council, voted for Resolution 1441, which paved the way for the resumption of weapons inspections in Iraq. It said it did so on assurances that this would avoid a war.

But as war approached, it joined China, France, Germany and Russia in preventing a new resolution specifically authorising an attack on Iraq.

Assad, never known for his diplomatic language, publicly predicted that the US would become bogged down in Iraq as it had in Vietnam, or would be forced to abandon the country as it had, in the 1980s, abandoned Lebanon, which is now under Syrian dominance.

His words made analysts wonder precisely what Syria's intentions are, especially since the interview was published the same day as a call by the country's religious mufti for suicide attacks against US forces.

But while those intentions were being debated, US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld spoke ominously of what he said were concrete actions.

He told a press briefing that Syria was shipping military supplies to Iraq, and termed this a "hostile" act.

"We have information of shipments of military supplies crossing the border from Syria into Iraq," Rumsfeld told journalists at the Pentagon, adding that the equipment included night vision goggles.

"These deliveries pose a direct threat to the lives of coalition forces," he said. "We consider such trafficking as hostile acts and will hold the Syrian government accountable for such shipments."

He declined to say whether the Syrian government was behind the shipments, but stressed, "They control their border. We're hopeful that kind of thing does not happen again.

"There is no question but that to the extent military supplies, equipment or people move borders between Iraq and Syria that it vastly complicates our situation," he said.

As for the call for suicide attacks, by Sheikh Ahmad Kaftaro, they must necessarily have had the approval of Assad's regime. They echoed a warning by Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Lebanon's Syrian-backed Lebanese Hizbollah movement, that such attacks might be expected.

Although Syria is not included in US President George W. Bush's "axis of evil", which groups Iran, Iraq and North Korea, it is still on the State Department's list of countries supporting terrorism.

And like Iran, it fears it may be the next US target in Washington's "war on terrorism".

"America wants to remodel the region to its own liking," Assad alleged, repeating the common Syrian line that thew US is acting in the interests of its ally, Israel, and implicitly stressing that his government will have no part in it.

Analysts said Syria was determined to see the return of the Golan Heights, captured by Israel in 1967, and to continue its influence over Lebanon, not to mention the lasting grip on power by the ruling Baath party.

But one analyst, who did not wish to be named, said it was unclear yet whether Syria would try to do a deal with the US or if it would back guerrilla groups that might emerge to fight the US presence in Iraq.

Assad accused the United States of responsibility for the present "unstable" relations between the two countries, citing Secretary of State Colin Powell's statement to a House of Representatives committee on March 14 that Syria was "occupying" Lebanon.

Assad's remarks, however, prompted the Lebanese press to recall an old Arab saying from 50 years ago: "No war without Egypt, no peace without Syria."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arab; iraq; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Mark17
Yeah, I lived there, too. Gruess Gott and the Abrams is no match for the T-whatever. Pacifists, right.
21 posted on 03/28/2003 5:39:52 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Are you of the opinion that during WWII, Churchill really wanted to see the Germans and Russians really chew each other up?
22 posted on 03/28/2003 5:42:46 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: isom35
Agreed, and no one has been playing that "liberate the Syrians" song, have they?
Yo-Syria, come get some!
23 posted on 03/28/2003 5:45:18 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rams82

NEXT!


24 posted on 03/28/2003 5:46:59 PM PST by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rams82
That butthead better hope we fail to depose Saddam...

'Cause his ass ain't far behind!

25 posted on 03/28/2003 5:49:15 PM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
Churchill really wanted to see the Germans and Russians really chew each other up?

Churchill thought highly of the Germans and their army. By the same token, he wanted to beat them. Don't know if he thought of Russians much, if at all. But Uncle Joe sure had to beat on Churchill and FDR forever to get the Western Front opened. Seemed like a long delay at the time. Maybe it was.

26 posted on 03/28/2003 5:52:33 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rams82
Thanks for this post.

The lady who cuts my hair left Syria about 7 years ago. A great story, she arrived in the US with next to nothing. Now she's married and on the verge of buying her first home.

She says most Americans don't realize that her country is also a brutal dictatorship. She told me last week that she prays every night that America will free her homeland, which she obviously still loves deeply. Her relatives back in Syria feel the same--all hope that one day their country will be a democracy. I hope so, too.
27 posted on 03/28/2003 6:06:13 PM PST by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Oh, that's the first time I've heard that one../sarcasm

Are you Bennie from "The Mummy"?..."Like I never heard that before.."...

BWAHAHAHA!!!

FMCDH

28 posted on 03/28/2003 6:21:38 PM PST by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rams82
Hey, Syria, we got 2 words for ya!

YOU'RE NEXT

29 posted on 03/28/2003 6:23:48 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rams82

Why do you suppose this fellow doesn't stand first in line?


In the Great Mosque of Umayyade,
Greeting the Mufti of Syria, Sheikh Kaftaro

30 posted on 03/28/2003 6:31:07 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laz17
Actually, the Cold War was WWIII (that included the three major hot wars, Korea, Vietnam, & the Soviets in Afghanistan, plus numerous smaller conflicts.) This is WWIV. I've known that since September 11, but it's only now becoming clear who is on what side.
31 posted on 03/28/2003 6:31:47 PM PST by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rams82
"Syrian President Bashar al-Assad"

Dead man squawking.

32 posted on 03/28/2003 6:37:49 PM PST by IoCaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walden
"Actually, the Cold War was WWIII (that included the three major hot wars, Korea, Vietnam, & the Soviets in Afghanistan, plus numerous smaller conflicts.) This is WWIV. I've known that since September 11, but it's only now becoming clear who is on what side."

I've read a very cogent article with this analysis.
Can't remember. Was it Paul Johnson?

Incidentally, each new World War begins with a re-alignmnent of enemies and allies. Certainly that is under way now.
33 posted on 03/28/2003 6:46:04 PM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson