Skip to comments.
So this is Plan B, the 'Hail Mary' play from the North (facing defeat US forces are desperate)
Irish Independent ^
| Rupert Cornwell in Washington
Posted on 03/28/2003 7:36:48 AM PST by dead
EVEN on Donald Henry Rumsfeld, that formidable and remarkably well preserved 70 year old who as Secretary of Defence is running the campaign in Iraq, the strain is starting to tell.
Outwardly, it is the pugnacious Rumsfeld of always, the steamrollering CEO who brooks no dissent. Look more closely, however, and the lines of strain are visible. The tiredness is evident in the eyes behind those rimless spectacles. And small wonder.
For he is the man in the hot seat as, eight days into the Gulf War of 2003, a once cocksure America is forced to face the possibility it may be months, not weeks before a war sold as a virtual cakewalk, may finally be over.
"Saddam has learnt from Gulf War One, and he's learnt from Mogadishu," Kenneth Pollack, an Iraq specialist at the Brookings Institution said yesterday, referring to the unhappy US military intervention in Somalia in 1993, which ended after dead American soldiers were dragged through the streets of Mogadishu. "He's learnt that irregulars and paramilitaries can cause problems, using things like human shields. Maybe he watched the movie 'Black Hawk Down' over again," and Mr Pollack adds, "I'm only half-facetious."
Pentagon officials grudgingly admit that the resistance has been stronger and more tenacious than expected.
Admittedly, friendly fire apart, US and British casualties have been minimal. But the guerrilla hit-and-run tactics, coupled with the blinding sandstorms of the last two days, have slowed the advance.
Supply lines strung out for 250 miles or more on jammed, inadequate highways have been stretched to breaking point. This week, the US 3rd Infantry Division leading, the thrust to Baghdad, virtually ground to a halt, short of fuel and even food and water. Sheer exhaustion is also forcing a pause, in which to regroup, rearm and resupply.
Did Washington, seduced by the dream of a speedy and easy victory, put too few troops in the field? No, answer of course the architects of the strategy. "Our plan is brilliant," General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, proclaimed as the first doubts began to stir. "We're on track, we're on plan. We think we have just the right forces for what we need to do now."
Esteemed experts beg to differ. There is just a hint of the Hail Mary play about Plan B. That last minute all or nothing American football game plan to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. As the Northern front opens with support from the Kurds much now depends on this last throw of the dice to decide what will be either a comprehensive sweeping victory or a long dragged out and even bloodier affair. They point out that the 250,000 troops deployed in and around Iraq are only half the force massed for Gulf War One - which moreover was fought in flat desert conditions ideal for US mechanised armour. The actual ground combat force is somewhere between 75,000 and 100,000.
The heavy forces in the field - the 3rd Infantry, the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force and the 101st Airborne (not yet fully deployed in Iraq) plus the British are not enough, they say - even given total US/British domination in the air. "We needed at least four divisions and the British. We've got three and the British and we're getting a harder war than expected," says Pollack.
Of the above elements, only the 3rd Infantry is a really heavy fighting force with tanks and armoured vehicles. Additionally, the withering air fire put up by Republican Guard units blunts the effectiveness of the deadliest US battlefield weapon, the Apache attack helicopter.
But the deficiency should be made up with the belated arrival of the 4th Infantry Division, which was supposed to have launched a second front from the north towards Tikrit, Saddam's family stronghold, and Baghdad itself.
That plan perished when Turkey refused to allow US ground troops to use Turkish bases. The 1,000-man paratroop landing in Kurdish-controlled Iraq on Wednesday is scant substitute for the 62,000 men the Pentagon wanted to mass along the Turkish border.
Now the 4th Infantry and its 30,000 troops are being deployed from Fort Hood, Texas to Kuwait, from where they will move north to reinforce the US force gathering to launch the decisive assault on Baghdad. The armada of ships carrying their armour has started to arrive in the Gulf from the Eastern Mediterranean.
The 4th Infantry should be combat-ready sometime early in April. At that point it will move north to the front, allowing secondary forces to be released to guard supply lines. All of which is reasonable enough - except that it wasn't in the original script.
More than any other in history this media-saturated war, with its unprecedented real time coverage from the front, has been a prisoner of expectations. Alas, expectations, exactly like financial markets, overshoot in both directions.
The optimism at the outset was excessive, fuelled by the likes of Dick Cheney, the vice-President, who predicted on national television that the Republican Guard would do what General Myers yesterday called "the honourable thing," and not fight at all. Until early this week, the mighty array of pundits and military specialists did not mention the word "Fedayeen."
Mr Rumsfeld warned yesterday: "We must expect that it will require the coalition forces moving through, destroying Republican Guard units around Baghdad, before you see the crumbling of the regime." But will that take weeks, or months? © Independent News Service.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; antiamerican; antibush; doomandgloom; iraqifreedom; lordhawhaw; mediabias; mediahysteria; northernfront; propaganda; quagmire; thisisseries; warplans; wontspeakfarsi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-218 last
To: WhiskeyPapa
That's certainly grown up. I guess you've finally given up trying to support your interpretation of the American Civil War then.This is a conservative forum for conservatives. As a liberal and a Gore voter, you have no credibility in any discussion here at Freerepublic.
To: WhiskeyPapa
If Baghdad falls in a few weeks, it will hardly vindicate Secretary Rumsfield.
In the spotlight again, Rumsfeld, a Navy pilot and All-Navy Wrestling Champion
Daily Princetonian ^ | 11/26/01 | Brendan F. Wallace
Posted on 04/02/2003 6:58 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
In the aftermath of Sept. 11 and commencement of America's War on Terrorism, Princeton alum Donald Rumsfeld '54 has quickly become one of the most visible members of the Bush administration.
Considered the leading 'hawk' of the administration, Rumsfeld has become a trusted confidant and adviser to President Bush.
And as the campaign against terrorism continues, Rumsfeld will likely become one of the most prominent defense secretaries since Robert McNamara during the Vietnam War.
But before arriving in Washington, Rumsfeld was a star both in the Navy and at Princeton.
Rumsfeld's life seems to be a unique mixture of corporate success and political leadership. Known as "Rummy" to his close friends, Rumsfeld has at various times been a scholar, a navy pilot, high government bureaucrat, national-level athlete, foreign diplomat and corporate honcho.
Through it all, however, he has always maintained his friendly but professional demeanor that has been the hallmark of his success since graduating from Princeton in 1954.
For Rumsfeld, it seems as though anything and everything is possible. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger perhaps best described him, writing, "Rumsfeld afforded me a close-up look at a special Washington phenomenon: The skilled full-time politician-bureaucrat in whom ambition, ability and substance fuse seamlessly."
Born in 1932 in Chicago to middle-class parents, the young Donald Rumsfeld attended New Trier High School, one of America's top 10 public schools at the time.
An accomplished athlete in high school, he turned down athletic scholarships from a half-dozen mid-western colleges and instead decided to attend Princeton on an academic scholarship.
At Princeton, Rumsfeld won many Ivy League and All-Eastern wrestling titles, in addition to being a member of the lightweight football team.
He majored in politics and wrote his thesis on "The Steel Seizure Case of 1952 and Its Effects on Presidential Powers."
The thesis probed Harry Truman's controversial attempt to forestall a 1952 steelworker's strike by nationalizing the nation's steel mills.
At his commencement, Rumsfeld was inspired by an address given by Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson II '22, who urged Princeton graduates to pursue politically active careers and to serve their nation.
Taking Stevenson's words to heart, Rumsfeld began a brief but successful career as a pilot for the Navy, serving from 1954 to 1957.
He quickly acquired a reputation as one of the Navy's most daring and aggressive pilots, well liked and respected by his fellow Naval aviators.
While in the Navy, Rumsfeld won an All-Navy wrestling championship and went to the U.S. district trials for a slot on the 1956 Olympic team.
However, a devastating shoulder injury shattered his hopes for an Olympic medal and he left the Navy the following year.
After leaving the Navy in 1957, Rumsfeld briefly studied law at Georgetown and Case Western universities.
Still enamored with politics, however, he withdrew from school to work in Washington, D.C. as a top aide to Republicans Ohio Congressman David Dennison and future senator Robert Griffin.
After a brief stint with an investment banking firm in Chicago, Rumsfeld returned to the House of Representatives in 1962 as a congressman in his own right.
Having won a congressional seat representing his home district on Chicago's North Shore, Rumsfeld quickly acquired a reputation as one of the leading liberals in the Republican party.
Serving four terms, Rumsfeld became the leader of a group of like-minded Republicans known as the "Rumsfeld Raiders."
In 1969, Rumsfeld resigned from Congress to head the Office of Economic Opportunity in the Nixon administration.
As director of OEO, Rumsfeld worked with Princeton friend Frank Carlucci '52 - later Reagan's Secretary of Defense - and former New Jersey governor and current Environmental Protection Agency administrator Christie Whitman.
Afterwards, Rumsfeld served as Nixon's economic stabilization program director, but then left Washington to serve as the U.S. ambassador to the NATO in 1973.
Stationed in Brussels, Belgium during the Watergate scandal, Rumsfeld avoided being too closely associated with Nixon - a coincidence representing political good fortune for Rumsfeld.
Later in 1974, however, he returned to Washington to assist incoming President Gerald Ford's transition team, ultimately becoming the White House's de facto chief of staff.
When Ford dismissed James Schlesinger as Defense Secretary in 1975, Rumsfeld quickly assumed the Cabinet position and managed to install his protegee Dick Cheney as his successor.
Although he was the youngest Secretary of Defense at age 43, Rumsfeld ran the Pentagon with an iron fist.
In his one term at the Pentagon, Rumsfeld sought to promote greater preparedness for the U.S. armed forces and initiated the development of the B1 bomber, as well as the Trident nuclear submarine program.
After his years in government, Rumsfeld returned to his alma mater in 1977 to lecture at the Wilson School.
During this time, economics professor Uwe Reinhardt noted, "One day, shortly after he arrived here, he wandered about the fourth floor of the [Wilson School] in a way that suggested to me he was looking for the men's room.
" 'You look lost, Mr. Secretary,' I said. 'Can I help you?' Whereupon Mr. Rumsfeld replied curtly, 'I'm never lost, son. I always know where I'm going.'
"That's Rumsfeld, the navy pilot," Reinhardt said.
Also in 1977, Rumsfeld received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian award.
In June of 1977, he became CEO of G.D. Searle & Co., a leading international pharmaceutical company.
Under his direction and leadership, G.D. Searle & Co. experienced a remarkable financial recovery, earning Mr. Rumsfeld two awards as outstanding CEO in the pharmaceutical industry.
He then went on to become Chairman and CEO of General Instruments, a company which pioneered the development of broadband technology and high definition television.
Despite his re-entry into the business sector in the 1980s, Rumsfeld continued to occupy a number of government positions, including special envoy to the Middle East, member of the President's General Advisory Committee on Arms Control, and member of the National Economic Commission.
Although he contemplated running for president in 1988, he withdrew from the race early on and decided to give his support to his friend Bob Dole, a Republican senator from Kansas.
Consequently, George Bush Sr. refused to give Rumsfeld any position in his administration.
In 1996, Rumsfeld again gave support to Bob Dole's unsuccessful presidential campaign against Clinton.
Ironically, it was only with Clinton's victory that Rumsfeld returned to Washington politics.
Clinton asked Mr. Rumsfeld to chair an inquiry into the feasibility and need for a national missile defense program that had been proposed in Congress.
After chairing this inquiry board, Rumsfeld recommended that Clinton proceed with the development of a national missile defense system.
Although Clinton pronounced himself unsold on the issue and left the issue to be decided by his successor, Rumsfeld nonetheless earned a name for himself as a leading advocate of missile defense.
With George W. Bush's victory in 2000, Rumsfeld was again appointed Secretary of Defense on account of his strong advocacy for national missile defense, his impeccable personal life and his vast experience in Washington politics.
Now the oldest man ever to serve as defense secretary, Rumsfeld, 69, has resurrected the same hard-nosed style of leadership that he employed as secretary under Nixon.
Unlike his predecessors, Rumsfeld refuses to work at the large walnut desk in his office but, rather, prefers to work standing up at a small metal desk.
As one of his aides has noted, "He never seems to sit down." Pentagon jargon now includes the term "snowflakes" - referring to the endless stream of instructions and queries Rumsfeld fires off into a dictaphone which are transcribed and directed into every corner of the building.
Rumsfeld has sought to eliminate what he terms the "iron triangle" - the military-industrial alliance of generals, manufacturers and Congressmen.
Seeking to alienate all three elements of the "iron triangle," he has drawn a good deal of attention as a true military reformer.
Similarly, Rumsfeld has challenged the long-standing military principle that the United States should be equipped to fight two large-scale wars simultaneously.
Prior to Sept. 11, Rumsfeld had concentrated on revamping the armed forces to deal with modern global threats and to reform the inefficiencies that have historically plagued the U.S. military.
In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, Rumsfeld's priorities have changed considerably as America's new war in Afghanistan has warranted his undivided attention.
Having watched the World Trade Center attacks unfold on television, Rumsfeld was in a CIA. briefing when the hijacked 757 crashed into the Pentagon.
Ignoring the advice of safety personnel that he be evacuated through the basement, Rumsfeld rushed to the pulverized wing of the Pentagon immediately after the crash to assist with rescue efforts for the wounded.
In the words of Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, "He just kept on dealing with the crisis, without regard for his own safety."
More than two months after the attacks, Rumsfeld remains a highly visible figure and his approval rating has skyrocketed.
He brings a wealth of experience to the Bush administration's new war on terrorism.
Navy pilot, investment banker, Olympic-level wrestler, twice Secretary of Defense, NATO diplomat, CEO and family man, Donald Rumsfeld has been one of Princeton's most successful graduates.
To: Pukka Puck
I wish him all the best.
Walt
203
posted on
04/02/2003 7:34:42 AM PST
by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
To: dead
Desperately looking for failure.
To: dead
Was this written by Bono?
To: WhiskeyPapa
Maybe you would be more happy in France...where they share your hatred for everything American.
To: exmarine
Maybe you would be more happy in France...where they share your hatred for everything American. I'm a former Marine myself.
Just because I don't worship people simply because they are good at sound bites doesn't put a beret on my head.
Walt
207
posted on
04/02/2003 8:25:41 AM PST
by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
To: WhiskeyPapa
I simply do not understand criticism of the war so far. Two recognized and proven principles of war from Clauswitz and Nimitz that are being employed masterfully in this war are:
1) Go straight for the power center of the enemy as swiftly as possible. Done. We are all over Baghdad.
2) Bypass strongholds that are unnecessary to ultimate victory (remember Rabaul in WWII?). Done.
I might also add that the war is only 2 weeks old and we are kicking ass! So, the naysayers are either just ignorant boobs who wouldn't know a military campaign from a slopshoot, or they secretly wish that America would lose this war in order to satisfy some inner masochistic thirst for the destruction of America as we know it. Which group are you in?
To: WhiskeyPapa
Esteemed experts beg to differ. There is just a hint of the Hail Mary play about Plan B. That last minute all or nothing American football game plan to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. As the Northern front opens with support from the Kurds much now depends on this last throw of the dice to decide what will be either a comprehensive sweeping victory or a long dragged out and even bloodier affair. They point out that the 250,000 troops deployed in and around Iraq are only half the force massed for Gulf War One - which moreover was fought in flat desert conditions ideal for US mechanised armour. The actual ground combat force is somewhere between 75,000 and 100,000. Who among these "esteemed" experts, has access to the war plan? ZERO. Many of these bozos are incompetent Clinton appointees who would be laughed at and ridiculed by Chesty Puller as armchair generals. And the journalists! Most journalists (save Fox News) are anti-American liberal marxists who hate everything about America and don't know the first thing about military strategy. I say we bring back the Sedition Act and jail these traitors - especially Jennings of ABC, and I think CNN should be unplugged in the interest of national security. This war on terrorism is a war for national survival and anyone who stands in the way of victory should be arrested. Lincoln set aside the writ of Habeus Corpus in 1861 and Bush should consider a similar move. Britain arrested every german and italian in country and sent them to the Isle of Man in WW II - we could send all the jouralists and Hollyweird nitwits to Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket! As for the protestors who break laws and impede others' rights to get to work - they should first get the baton! Then PRISON!
To: WhiskeyPapa
But, for everyone other than media naysayers, it's the Anglo-Aussie-American side who are the geniuses. Rumsfeld's view that one shouldn't do it with once-a-decade force, but with a lighter, faster touch has been vindicated, with interesting implications for other members of the axis of evil and its reserve league.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/885352/posts
To: exmarine
I might also add that the war is only 2 weeks old and we are kicking ass! So, the naysayers are either just ignorant boobs who wouldn't know a military campaign from a slopshoot, or they secretly wish that America would lose this war in order to satisfy some inner masochistic thirst for the destruction of America as we know it. Which group are you in?
Tell it like it is, brother.
To: Godebert
This is a conservative forum for conservatives. As a liberal and a Gore voter, you have no credibility in any discussion here at Freerepublic.
I think that should be as a liberal, Gore voter, and regular NPR listener, WP has no credibility here at Free Republic. WP uses the crap he hears on NPR to back up his anti-American spewing.
To: Pukka Puck
NPR and the marxist "Atlanta Journal Constitution". I think he reads that rag every day.
To: dead
The Irish hatred of all things British (and any projection of English power) is what is driving this nonsense.
I say this as an American of Irish background.
To: WhiskeyPapa
Rummy was right and you were wrong.
To: Godebert
Thanks for the link. I didn't realize what an ash WP is.
216
posted on
04/18/2003 5:50:16 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: dead
Sounds a lot like Dowd. Can there be two of "her" in the world?
217
posted on
04/18/2003 6:06:37 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: Pukka Puck
Rummy was right and you were wrong. I never said anything that the man didn't deserve a lot of hero worship until he produced. Now he has and he deserves great credit for a job well done. So does the whole administration.
There is still a lot more to do, but the military thing went very well.
Walt
218
posted on
04/20/2003 8:16:32 AM PDT
by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-218 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson