Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biggest British tank battle since El Alamein
The Times ^ | March 28, 2003 | David Charter and Alan Hamilton

Posted on 03/27/2003 4:19:08 PM PST by MadIvan

Challengers wipe out column of Iraqi T55s after chance encounter in Basra desert

THE morning sun was up, the fog of war had briefly lifted. In the distance, a moving cloud of dust betrayed a column of armour on the move.

Twenty miles southeast of Basra, 14 Challenger 2 tanks of C Squadron, Royal Scots Dragoon Guards, were on their way to reinforce 3 Commando Brigade, Royal Marines on al-Faw peninsula.

They were not expecting tanks from the north; they had another mission in mind. But they had reached the position they were in only because of some speedy and brilliant bridge building by 28 Regiment, Royal Engineers, to get them across the obstacle of the Basra Canal.

Long-range spotters with the Dragoon Guards peered at the dust cloud; distinctive lumps on the distant armour immediately identified it as a column of Iraqi T55 tanks. The Scots crews were about to engage in the biggest — and most decisive — tank battle fought by the British since El Alamein in the Second World War.

The Iraqi column, which had moved south out of Basra, had already been pounded by air bombardment and artillery. Remnants were trying to disperse across open countryside. When the approaching armour had been spotted and identified, the Dragoon Guards, who had been travelling from west to east, split into two groups of seven tanks each as they closed in on the enemy.

One group came across a troop of Iraqi T55s in the process of being deserted as their occupants realised they were being overwhelmed by air and ground assaults. The other tempted the enemy into a “kill box” in a classic hunter-killer battlefield technique.

They lured the Iraqi squadron into believing they were being attacked only by a light infantry unit of commandos. But when the old Russian-built tanks made themselves visible in a wooded area, the Challengers moved in from the flank and began picking them off one by one at a range of about 1,500 metres.

“This was shock action. It was 14 against 14, and the score was 14-nil,” a military spokesman at UK National Contingent headquarters in Qatar said after the brief encounter, which is now regarded as one of the most decisive actions by ground forces in the war so far. “It was nothing less than a suicide mission by the Iraqis; it had no military logic,” the spokesman said.

The T55s, an upgraded version of an old Soviet warhorse dating back to 1955, stood little chance against the Challengers. The British tanks opened fire simultaneously, firing up to six rounds a minute with deadly accuracy while still bouncing over the rough ground at 25mph.

Their advanced stabilisation system, the best of its kind, keeps the gun steady and aimed even when the vehicle is jolting over rocky terrain. The T55s, which cannot fire effectively on the move and have to stop to take an accurate shot, had no chance.

Inside the 61-ton Challengers, the gunners were using the world’s most sophisticated tank targeting system, using a console similar to that on a PlayStation computer game to pick out targets at will. Commanders say this system is loved by young crews used to the non-stop action of computer battle games.

But this was no game. The Challengers were firing depleted uranium shells that drill through armour to create a vacuum and incredible heat inside the target, sucking all air and life from it.

Inside the Challengers, the well-rehearsed, clinically efficient process of aiming, loading, firing and reloading was repeated 14 times. The encounter was over in a matter of minutes. All 14 Iraqi tanks were destroyed, and all 14 British, each with a four-man crew, escaped unscathed.

One British commander denied that the engagement had been a “turkey shoot”, with the enemy standing no chance. “If you see the enemy you do not wait for them to shoot first,” he said.

“This was what we call a ‘meeting engagement’ because the two forces just ran into each other. We were moving from west to east to reinforce the Royal Marines on the east side of Basra when we happened to bump into 14 T55s which were coming from the north to the south towards Umm Qsar.” Another tank officer said that the engagement had been “like the bicycle against the motor car”.

Among the Dragoon Guards there was jubilation and not a little nationalistic pride. “This is what we’ve been waiting for, and this is what Scotland’s cavalry does the best,” a regimental spokesman said.

“Until now we felt as though we had been left somewhat on the sidelines, now now we’ve had some serious tank-on-tank action that has really got the guys buzzing.”

The spokesman added: “To take out 14 tanks, which is the equivalent of an entire British squadron, is a massive achievement. It’s a severe blow to what is already a hugely demoralised army, and hopefully it might tempt some of the hard cases currently in Basra to think again.”

The mood among C Squardon was one of euphoria last night. Captain Patrick Trueman, of the Dragoon Guards, shared the moment of jubiliation.

“This has been a famous victory and one which should go down in the regiment’s history. Everyone here is delighted at the efforts of C Squadron, which have given the entire battle group a massive boost ahead of some very trying times.”

By yesterday afternoon British officers were describing the area south of Basra as “a T55 graveyard” after a series of coalition strikes that have left dozens of burnt-out Iraqi vehicles littering the terrain.

However, US Central Command admitted that reports of a giant column of more than 100 armoured vehicles charging out of Basra on Wednesday night were grossly exaggerated because of a false electronic surveillance signal.

It was, US commanders said, a classic example of the fog of war. “We determined it was a different-sized force, and we destroyed it,” a US military spokesman said.

The daylight foray by Iraqi tanks yesterday morning may have been an attempt to test the strength of British forces enclircling Basra, or a vain attempt to relieve the southern port of Uum Qsar, British sources believe.

Alternatively, they believe, the Iraqi tactic, carried out by press-ganged crews, may be to engage in regular confrontations, however suicidal, because images or reports of fighting play well in the Arab world.

But it was from military headquarters all the way back to the Dragoon Guards’ Scots homeland that yesterday’s confrontation played exceptionally well.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: basra; blair; bush; challenger2; elalamein; iraq; saddam; t55; t55s; turkeyshoot; uk; us; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: Kay Soze
"Why are the Iraqis using T-55 Russian tanks?"

Because the Iraqi army was equipped and trained by the Soviet Union back in the 1960s and 1970s. They use old Soviet equipment and used old Soviet doctrine. (Although recently, it seems they have decided to use Osama's playbook.)

"Wher are the US Made M-16's, F16s and Abrham Tanks we supposedly supplied Saddam?????"

We never did. Never supplied him with weapons. (May have thought about it during the Iran-Iraq war, but we never did. Besides, the CCCP was giving them stuff free.)
41 posted on 03/27/2003 4:38:04 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Slainte; MadIvan
Hooray for the boys. However, I could do without the pipes.
42 posted on 03/27/2003 4:40:21 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The Challengers were firing depleted uranium shells that drill through armour to create a vacuum and incredible heat inside the target, sucking all air and life from it.

What a lovely thought. What a fitting fate.

43 posted on 03/27/2003 4:40:46 PM PST by Noumenon (You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Fifteen - zip!

44 posted on 03/27/2003 4:41:19 PM PST by martin_fierro (Mr. Avuncular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Ummmm..... hang on. Hate to rain history on any parade, and I may be incorrect, but wasn't the largest since then actually between the Germans and Russians in the battle of Kursk?

Makes everything else look like a Sunday picnic.

45 posted on 03/27/2003 4:42:13 PM PST by Pahuanui (When a foolish man hears about the Tao, he laughs out loud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Alternatively, they [British sources] believe, the Iraqi tactic, carried out by press-ganged crews, may be to engage in regular confrontations, however suicidal, because images or reports of fighting play well in the Arab world.

Here's to plenty of good play in the Arab press!

46 posted on 03/27/2003 4:42:47 PM PST by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
“This was shock action. It was 14 against 14, and the score was 14-nil...”

The Brits do everything with such piss and vinegar. Good work, Tommy!

47 posted on 03/27/2003 4:45:01 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I so appreciate the Brits!
48 posted on 03/27/2003 4:45:44 PM PST by solzhenitsyn ("Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Magoo
If you intended to salute the Brits, putting up Monty's pic is a bit of damned by faint praise.

Many American service men of that era wished he would have stayed inside this tank until hostilities had concluded.

49 posted on 03/27/2003 4:46:10 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Biggest British tank battle since El Alamein

This news might be a big shock to the vets of those tanks battles around Caen in Normandy.

50 posted on 03/27/2003 4:46:10 PM PST by u-89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Good show, old man!
51 posted on 03/27/2003 4:47:18 PM PST by Aeronaut (It's all about You, Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadojeS
Well done Scotts! The spirit of Monte surely rides with you all. The Brits are most impressive in this campaign.
52 posted on 03/27/2003 4:47:46 PM PST by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Great post! This is great news and I salute the Brits!
53 posted on 03/27/2003 4:50:37 PM PST by Lauratealeaf (God Bless Our Troops and President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Awesome!! I have been away from the news all day, and this was just the good news I needed with a cold beer!
54 posted on 03/27/2003 4:56:55 PM PST by SeeRushToldU_So ( Something witty, etc, etc....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pahuanui
>>>>>but wasn't the largest since then actually between the Germans and Russians in the battle of Kursk?

Biggest BRITISH tank battle?

55 posted on 03/27/2003 4:59:22 PM PST by patented
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
A piper says "fie on thee".
56 posted on 03/27/2003 5:01:08 PM PST by TexanToTheCore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Slainte
Desert Camoflauge Bagpipes...Cool!

Nice to see the Scottish Highlanders in there...they have jumbo gnads...playing the pipes into battle even to this day...too bad they don't still where the kilt.

Biggest since El Alamein...wow...

57 posted on 03/27/2003 5:01:13 PM PST by Im Your Huckleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pahuanui
Makes everything else look like a Sunday picnic.

Biggest British tank battle...there were no British forces at Kursk.

58 posted on 03/27/2003 5:01:43 PM PST by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Coronet isn't French. Its Russian and called the Kornet.
59 posted on 03/27/2003 5:02:17 PM PST by chilepepper (Gnocchi Seuton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Thanks for the two touchdown lead, Royal Scots. (14-0)
60 posted on 03/27/2003 5:04:18 PM PST by RobFromGa (Real Americans Support our Troops 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson