Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J
Here are the latest numbers as a percent of total imports:

France 22.5%, Australia 22%, China 5.8%, Russia 5.8% (2000)

Notice the absence of Autralia in the article and the absence of Germany on the list. I don't mind cites to support hypothesis but by the authors inference the afore unmentioned Australia is part of the problem and not the solution.

A point of argument yes, but also flawed inductive reasoning if taken to a conclusion certain.

12 posted on 03/27/2003 1:27:06 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amerigomag
And where is the US on that list? I know we're a big buyer in the food-for-oil program...
16 posted on 03/27/2003 1:31:24 PM PST by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Amerigomag
Part of the problem? I think you missed the entire thrust of the article. It isn't about trade it's about who's ox is going to get gored and why these countries act as they do.

France, Germany, Russia and China are protecting their financial interests, thus, their attempts to derail any military action. Their statements about protecting the Iraqi people are a smokescreen for the almighty Franc, Mark, Ruble and whatever.

Looking at the numbers, it appears Germany is right up there with the other weasels, but maybe they weren't ranked because, as the article points out, much of their trade is through third parties and harder to track.

Even though Australia seems to do significant trade with Iraq, it's military is assisting in the war, so by all measure, their position is more noble as they will lose it all if somewhow Saddam stays in power.
23 posted on 03/27/2003 1:43:46 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson