Christopher writes, "[the] man who punched the war protester". Notice the liberal bias and spin? If the situation were reversed and it was a "anti-war" protester who attacked a flag-waving patriot, Christopher would very likely have written: "[the] man who allegedly punched..."
Also, another Freeper has pointed out that Mr. Krasowski's wife claims that it was the flag desiccator who first attacked Krasowski. Now, none of us here know what really happened as of yet (and we may never know the truth), so we can only speculate on who is telling the truth (although I'm more inclined to believe Mrs. Krasowski). But isn't it "interesting" how Christopher of the WDH was able and willing to quote the witnesses on behalf of the flag desiccator, but not the witness(es) on behalf of Mr. Krasowski?
I raise this with Joel Christopher and will report response.