Skip to comments.
Man Accused Of Punching, Kicking War Protester Who Was Carrying a Defaced U.S. Flag
WISC-TV ^
Posted on 03/27/2003 10:00:09 AM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 261-278 next last
To: Dimensio; Chummy
TITLE 4--FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES CHAPTER 1--THE FLAG
Sec. 8. Respect for flag
No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America...(g) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature...The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing.
Perhaps you missed it the first time Chummy posted it?
101
posted on
03/27/2003 11:01:33 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: Ronaldus Magnus
God Bless that man. He should face no charges for his defense of the Flag.
102
posted on
03/27/2003 11:01:37 AM PST
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb the hell out of saddam. Bomb saddam to hell.)
To: Stone Mountain
Yup, it's amazing (and sad) how many people here are defending someone who would use violence to react to a political disagreement. If the political viewpoints were reversed, you can be sure this same group of people would be calling the attacker a terrorist...
I didn't read anything about violence...one american was just introducing a commie to some martial arts.
103
posted on
03/27/2003 11:02:00 AM PST
by
rj45mis
To: Ronaldus Magnus
Well, this guy needs to be punished. I'd suggest community service. Maybe a month of beer tasting at the local brewery. Or conducting surprise visits to the nudie clubs to make sure the girls all have their pasties on. Something to show that it's not acceptable to get caught beating-up up maggot infested hippies even if they are desecrating the flag.
104
posted on
03/27/2003 11:02:11 AM PST
by
Ditto
(You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
To: onetimeatbandcamp
Expressing an opinion that the US Flag should not be so desecrated is not an expression of free speech? Explain why. Explain why this physical act would not be protected, but an act of incitement is.
105
posted on
03/27/2003 11:02:21 AM PST
by
Chummy
To: Stone Mountain
Some people believe that the landmark Supreme Court ruling regarding flag desecration should simply be ignored because they don't like it.
To: rj45mis
Your response only supports his claim.
To: cardinal4
The pinko commie who desecrated the flag got what he deserved. It should be noted, as well, that he comitted a crime, too.
What crime was that?
To: Ronaldus Magnus
The jerk with the flag is the one who should be facing charges, starting with 'INCITING A RIOT'.
109
posted on
03/27/2003 11:04:12 AM PST
by
GLDNGUN
To: Stone Mountain
Gettin his butt whooped in public by a guy forty years older than him?
To: My back yard
111
posted on
03/27/2003 11:04:28 AM PST
by
Chummy
To: Chummy
Expressing an opinion that the US Flag should not be so desecrated is not an expression of free speech?
That was not the implication of the statement and you know it.
To: Ronaldus Magnus
The incident happened Monday afternoon outside the Marathon County Courthouse. Mike Wallschlaeger of Mosine carried an upside down flag with "EMPIRE" written across it. A fellow demonstrator says a man got out of his car, tried to grab the flag, then pushed Wallschlaeger to the ground, punched and kicked him.
So, where's the crime? If this had happened in a non-socialist state I'd be fairly confident that the jury would convenve about five minutes to decide its not-guilty verdict, but seeing as how this is the Peoples' Socialist Republic of Wiskonsin, I'm not so sure. Not quite as bad as the Peoples' Socialist Republics of Massachussets, Maryland, or Kalifornia, but still bad enough.
To: Chummy; All
Police who responded said both men would face disorderly conduct charges, but Brandimore said later that only the man accused of committing the assault, Casimir Krasowski, 63, of Wausau would be charged. Thank you for finding his name. I just called and spoke to his wife. She said that they are feeling very alone right now and that here husband did not attack anyone. She said he tried to talk the protester into putting the flag away and that it was the protester, not her husband, who became violent. They currently don't have an attorney or a legal defense fund. I conveyed our best wishes and ask that she call me if they decide to accept financial assistance for their legal defense.
To: Ronaldus Magnus
If burning a cross can be a hate crime, certainly "defacing" an American flag should be. Wish the Pubbies in congress would take this up.
115
posted on
03/27/2003 11:05:34 AM PST
by
11th_VA
(Let's Roll)
To: cardinal4; Dimensio
Precisely. I'm not citing any section of the Code that was struck down by SCOTUS, I'm simply showing what the Code says and indicating the violation thereof.
116
posted on
03/27/2003 11:05:45 AM PST
by
Chummy
To: Stone Mountain; Dimensio
If it were up to me; being an America Hater. But Its not. But read the statute, it doesnt give a chargeable offence, I agree. Im just pointing out that it appears to be against the law, but the only charges levied were against the guy who threw the punch. And make no mistake, if he is convicted he should pay the price, fine, whatever. But my feelings and convictions allow me to:
A.Call the protester a commie, and dislike him that reason,
B.Hope the guy who threw the punch gets off,
C.Lionize the man for kicking the hippies ass.
D. Contribute to his defence fund
117
posted on
03/27/2003 11:06:54 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: Dimensio
Interesting. So you believe that hatred is justification for violence... You don't watch wrasslin', do ya?
118
posted on
03/27/2003 11:07:06 AM PST
by
JohnnyZ
(Willing to consider an Iraqi bride)
To: Chummy
Expressing an opinion that the US Flag should not be so desecrated is not an expression of free speech? Explain why. Explain why this physical act would not be protected, but an act of incitement is.
This is a joke, right? You're not seriously comparing an assault on another person to expressing an opinion, are you?
To: HenryLeeII
So, where's the crime?
If the events reported in the article are accurate, then the crime occured when the man got out of his car and threw a punch. At least one person here has suggested that the events as reported are either incomplete or inaccurate, so it remains to be seen exactly what happened.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 261-278 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson