Posted on 03/27/2003 9:50:05 AM PST by Murtyo
The man who confessed to killing Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn today told a court he did it to protect the countrys muslim minority from Fortuyns anti-immigration policies.
Volkert van der Graaf, a 33-year-old animal rights activist, was arrested moments after Fortuyn was gunned down in a car park outside a radio studio on May 6, 2002, just days before a general election.
At the start of his trial today, he openly answered questions about the motives behind the first political assassination in modern Dutch history.
Although Van der Graaf confessed, under Dutch law prosecutors need to present their case to a panel of judges. There are no jury trials in the Netherlands.
Wearing a purple shirt and khakis, Van der Graaf appeared relaxed and confident. He briefly scanned the public gallery for familiar faces, avoiding eye contact with Fortuyns two brothers, Marten and Simon, who were sitting just a few yards away.
(The idea) was never concrete until the last moment, the day before the attack, Van der Graaf said, I confess to the shooting. He also confessed to illegal possession of firearms and sending Fortuyn threats before carrying out the attack.
Van der Graaf said he had followed Fortuyns career as a columnist for a popular national magazine and had was concerned he was using the weak parts of society to score points and gain political power.
Muslims in the Netherlands were being used as scapegoats, he said. I saw it as a danger, but what should you do about it? he said I hoped that I could solve it myself.
Separated from the courtroom by bullet-proof glass, onlookers continuously interrupted the proceedings, denouncing Van der Graaf as a murderer and chanting Life! Life! to press for a tough sentence.
Van der Graaf was caught with the murder weapon in his pocket and spatters of Fortuyns blood on his trousers. In November, he admitted carrying out the murder, saying he had been worried Fortuyn was gaining too much power and posed a threat to vulnerable members of society.
He is charged with premeditated murder and faces life in prison if convicted. During several days of hearings at a high-security courtroom nicknamed The Bunker, judges will consider his mental state at the time of the shooting and whether he can be held accountable for his actions.
Fortuyn, a brash gay academic and columnist, swiftly gained popularity with calls to close the borders to newcomers, at one time calling Islam a backward religion. His party won more than 10% of the electorate and a place in the three-party right-wing governing coalition.
After its unprecedented rise in power, bickering in Fortuyns party led to the fall of the government and fresh elections in January. With coalition talks ongoing, political stability has yet to returned to the country.
A graduate of the countrys leading agriculture university, Van der Graaf went on to become a tough and successful lawyer against commercial animal farming. At the time of the murder, he lived with his long-time girlfriend and baby daughter.
In prison, he went on hunger strike for more than two months to protest against round-the-clock camera surveillance in his cell.
Yeah right. It was an expert shot, followed by massive media denigration campaign aimed at Pim Fortuyn character. That can not be accomplished by deranged 'lone gunmen'.
Pim Fortuyn was not against Muslims. Many Duch Muslims were his voters. He was dangerous to Dutch liberal elites, he was against show trial in Den Hague taking place in Holland.
this trial will be used to obfuscate things even further.
As all Leftists, the killer is not only malicious --- he is also dishonest with himself: why do Muslims that are already in the country need protection from immigration policies. Nah, he simply hated Fortuyn because Fortuyn stood in his way.
Yep.
jDear Lord, knighthawk, words fail me.
I can just see a Muslim society welcoming gays openly,,( even if I kind of suspect they welcome them quietly....shhhhh)
Knighthawk, what is your report, what's being said in Holland about this guy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.