Before any shots are even fired, France surrenders.
I was laughing so hard that I couldn't read much past that, and almost didn't want to - because it was such a perfect moment. I really hope the rest of it doesn't suck.
Schroeder seems to be doing his darnedest to sink his own government by his uncanny skill of always making the wrong decision in both economic and foreign policy.
It's an open question how helpful a CDU government would be. Certainly the anti-American rhetoric would stop. At one time they seemed to want to challenge the French for European leadership rather than follow the French, their historical policy. Germany has always sought leadership in Eastern Europe, and so may reflect their support for "new" Europe. I doubt a new government would be as supportive as the British, in any case.
Ofcourse. The Euro currency is proof of this. The exchange rate with the USD still favors the EURO by about 10 cents--and the EURO was designed (and is propped up) to compete directly with the Dollar. It is also over-inflated (not just my opinion, but a belief held now by the many of the financially savvy in Frankfurt and Berlin).
This is a critical point in US history. I pray GW Bush does not melt--but stays firm. If Bush stands his ground, he will take the US to a new plane of strength. If he does not, Europe will sense fear and undermine America even more.
Iraq entered the picture several months later, in January 2002
BS. Bush Admin started talking about Saddam within the first week after 9/11.
IMO the article fails in three regards: one, it doesn't take into account France's monetary interests and power in Iraq, it's long relationship. Two, France opposed any deadline for enforcement ever. The issue of "inspectors" is really a non-starter. Threee, it fails to address the "counterbalance" argument, what did France and Germany intend to do with their strategy in Europe, and how they would position themselves as masters therein.